Do Citizens Agree with the EU AI Act? Public Perspectives on Risk and Regulation of AI Systems
Gabriel Lima, Gustavo Gil Gasiola, Frederike Zufall, Yixin Zou
Abstract
The European Union (EU) has spearheaded the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) with the AI Act, which regulates AI systems based on the risks they pose to fundamental rights and other protected values. AI systems that pose unacceptable risks are prohibited, high-risk AI systems must comply with mandatory requirements, and minimal risk AI systems are encouraged—but not required—to adopt voluntary standards. Motivated by concerns that the AI Act may not reflect the public’s opinions, we investigate how laypeople (N = 1,421) assess 48 different AI systems concerning their risk and regulation. We find that people believe all 48 AI systems pose moderate levels of risk and should be regulated (albeit without outright prohibitions). Our findings challenge the AI Act’s tiered approach, showing that people might support horizontal regulation requiring minimal standards for AI systems, and provide implications for developers seeking to develop AI aligned with public expectations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19478ed7-28b5-4cde-a4e1-5c782ac6ac72Builds on7
- Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and InconsistenciesSunnie S. Y. Kim, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Q. Vera Liao, Tania Lombrozo et al.CHI 2025 · 118 citations
- A World Full of Privacy and Security (Mis)conceptions? Findings of a Representative Survey in 12 CountriesFranziska Herbert, Steffen Becker, Leonie Schaewitz, Jonas Hielscher et al.CHI 2023 · 36 citations
- Public Opinions About Copyright for AI-Generated Art: The Role of Egocentricity, Competition, and ExperienceGabriel Lima, Nina Grgic-Hlaca, Elissa M. RedmilesCHI 2025 · 18 citations
- Exploring What People Need to Know to be AI Literate: Tailoring for a Diversity of AI Roles and ResponsibilitiesShixian Xie, John Zimmerman, Motahhare EslamiCHI 2025 · 17 citations
- Lawful Users: Copyright Circumvention and Legal Constraints on Technology UseCasey FieslerCHI 2020 · 15 citations
Related papers
- "You Can either Blame Technology or Blame a Person..." - A Conceptual Model of Users' AI-Risk Perception as a Tool for HCILena Recki, Dennis Lawo, Veronika Krauß, Dominik Pins et al.CSCW 2024 · 6 citations
- Modeling the Economic Impacts of AI Openness RegulationTori Qiu, Benjamin Laufer, Jon M. Kleinberg, Hoda HeidariNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- One AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople's Perception of AI RolesTaenyun Kim, Maria D. Molina, Minjin Rheu, Emily Shuo Zhan et al.CHI 2023 · 67 citations
- Towards a Responsible AI Organizational Maturity ModelAmy Heger, Samir Passi, Shipi Dhanorkar, Zoe Kahn et al.CSCW 2025 · 5 citations
- AIR-BENCH 2024: A Safety Benchmark based on Regulation and Policies Specified Risk CategoriesYi Zeng, Yu Yang, Andy Zhou, Jeffrey Ziwei Tan et al.ICLR 2025 · 5 citations
