Canonical normalizing flows for manifold learning
Kyriakos Flouris, Ender Konukoglu
Abstract
Manifold learning flows are a class of generative modelling techniques that assume a low-dimensional manifold description of the data. The embedding of such a manifold into the high-dimensional space of the data is achieved via learnable invertible transformations. Therefore, once the manifold is properly aligned via a reconstruction loss, the probability density is tractable on the manifold and maximum likelihood can be used to optimize the network parameters. Naturally, the lower-dimensional representation of the data requires an injective-mapping. Recent approaches were able to enforce that the density aligns with the modelled manifold, while efficiently calculating the density volume-change term when embedding to the higher-dimensional space. However, unless the injective-mapping is analytically predefined, the learned manifold is not necessarily an efficient representation of the data. Namely, the latent dimensions of such models frequently learn an entangled intrinsic basis, with degenerate information being stored in each dimension. Alternatively, if a locally orthogonal and/or sparse basis is to be learned, here coined canonical intrinsic basis, it can serve in learning a more compact latent space representation. Toward this end, we propose a canonical manifold learning flow method, where a novel optimization objective enforces the transformation matrix to have few prominent and non-degenerate basis functions. We demonstrate that by minimizing the off-diagonal manifold metric elements ℓ 1 -norm, we can achieve such a basis, which is simultaneously sparse and/or orthogonal. Canonical manifold flow yields a more efficient use of the latent space, automatically generating fewer prominent and distinct dimensions to represent data, and consequently a better approximation of target distributions than other manifold flow methods in most experiments we conducted, resulting in lower FID scores. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Inflationary Flows: Calibrated Bayesian Inference with Diffusion-Based ModelsDaniela de Albuquerque, John M. PearsonNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Injective flows for star-like manifoldsMarcello Massimo Negri, Jonathan Aellen, Volker RothICLR 2025
- Dynamic Compression Flows for Neuroscience DataGanchao Wei, Daniela de Albuquerque, Miles Martinez, Shiyang Pan et al.ICML 2026
Builds on11
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Topological AutoencodersMichael Moor, Max Horn, Bastian Rieck, Karsten M. BorgwardtICML 2020 · 192 citations
- Flows for simultaneous manifold learning and density estimationJohann Brehmer, Kyle CranmerNeurIPS 2020 · 187 citations
- Normalizing Flows on Tori and SpheresDanilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, Sébastien Racanière, Michael S. Albergo et al.ICML 2020 · 181 citations
- Relaxing Bijectivity Constraints with Continuously Indexed Normalising FlowsRobert Cornish, Anthony L. Caterini, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud DoucetICML 2020 · 141 citations
Related papers
- Rectangular Flows for Manifold LearningAnthony L. Caterini, Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Geoff Pleiss, John P. CunninghamNeurIPS 2021 · 58 citations
- Lifting Architectural Constraints of Injective FlowsPeter Sorrenson, Felix Draxler, Armand Rousselot, Sander Hummerich et al.ICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Tractable Density Estimation on Learned Manifolds with Conformal Embedding FlowsBrendan Leigh Ross, Jesse C. CresswellNeurIPS 2021 · 39 citations
- Principal Component FlowsEdmond Cunningham, Adam D. Cobb, Susmit JhaICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Learning Distributions on Manifolds with Free-Form FlowsPeter Sorrenson, Felix Draxler, Armand Rousselot, Sander Hummerich et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 7 citations
