More Identifiable yet Equally Performant Transformers for Text Classification
Rishabh Bhardwaj, Navonil Majumder, Soujanya Poria, Eduard H. Hovy
Abstract
Interpretability is an important aspect of the trustworthiness of a model's predictions. Transformer's predictions are widely explained by the attention weights, i.e., a probability distribution generated at its self-attention unit (head). Current empirical studies provide shreds of evidence that attention weights are not explanations by proving that they are not unique. A recent study showed theoretical justifications to this observation by proving the non-identifiability of attention weights. For a given input to a head and its output, if the attention weights generated in it are unique, we call the weights identifiable. In this work, we provide deeper theoretical analysis and empirical observations on the identifiability of attention weights. Ignored in the previous works, we find the attention weights are more identifiable than we currently perceive by uncovering the hidden role of the key vector. However, the weights are still prone to be non-unique attentions that make them unfit for interpretation. To tackle this issue, we provide a variant of the encoder layer that decouples the relationship between key and value vector and provides identifiable weights up to the desired length of the input. We prove the applicability of such variations by providing empirical justifications on varied text classification tasks. The implementations are available at https://github.com/declare-lab/ identifiable-transformers .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- Towards Transparent and Explainable Attention ModelsAkash Kumar Mohankumar, Preksha Nema, Sharan Narasimhan, Mitesh M. Khapra et al.ACL 2020 · 11 citations
- AttCAT: Explaining Transformers via Attentive Class Activation TokensYao Qiang, Deng Pan, Chengyin Li, Xin Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 66 citations
- Why Attentions May Not Be Interpretable?Bing Bai, Jian Liang, Guanhua Zhang, Hao Li et al.KDD 2021 · 51 citations
- XAI for Transformers: Better Explanations through Conservative PropagationAmeen Ali, Thomas Schnake, Oliver Eberle, Grégoire Montavon et al.ICML 2022 · 144 citations
- DecompX: Explaining Transformers Decisions by Propagating Token DecompositionAli Modarressi, Mohsen Fayyaz, Ehsan Aghazadeh, Yadollah Yaghoobzadeh et al.ACL 2023 · 7 citations
