PRISM: Festina Lente Proactivity—Risk-Sensitive, Uncertainty-Aware Deliberation for Proactive Agents
Yuxuan Fu, Xiaoyu Tan, Teqi Hao, Chen Zhan, Xihe Qiu
Abstract
Proactive agents must decide not only what to say but also whether and when to intervene. Many current systems rely on brittle heuristics or indiscriminate long reasoning, which offers little control over the benefit-burden tradeoff. We formulate the problem as cost-sensitive selective intervention and present PRISM, a novel framework that couples a decision-theoretic gate with a dual-process reasoning architecture. At inference time, the agent intervenes only when a calibrated probability of user acceptance exceeds a threshold derived from asymmetric costs of missed help and false alarms. Inspired by festina lente (Latin: "make haste slowly"), we gate by an acceptance-calibrated, cost-derived threshold and invoke a resource-intensive Slow mode with counterfactual checks only near the decision boundary, concentrating computation on ambiguous and high-stakes cases. Training uses gate-aligned, schema-locked distillation: a teacher running the full PRISM pipeline provides dense, executable supervision on unlabeled interaction traces, while the student learns a response policy that is explicitly decoupled from the intervention gate to enable tunable and auditable control. On PROACTIVEBENCH, PRISM reduces false alarms by 22.78% and improves F1 by 20.14% over strong baselines. These results show that principled decision-theoretic gating, paired with selective slow reasoning and aligned distillation, yields proactive agents that are precise, computationally efficient, and controllable. To facilitate reproducibility, we release our code, models, and resources at https://prism-festinalente.github.io/ ; all experiments use the open-source PROACTIVEBENCH benchmark.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 19305e1d-dce6-43e9-8df3-971154b1e2ccCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on12
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Without PromptingXuezhi Wang, Denny ZhouNeurIPS 2024 · 305 citations
Related papers
- Distilling LLM Agent into Small Models with Retrieval and Code ToolsMinki Kang, Jongwon Jeong, Seanie Lee, Jaewoong Cho et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 51 citations
- Intervene When It Doubts: Conjunction-Guided Interactive ReasoningQianyue Wang, Jinwu Hu, Yaofo Chen, Yufeng Wang et al.ICML 2026
- Test-time Prompt InterventionChenxu Yang, Qingyi Si, Mz Dai, Dingyu Yao et al.AAAI 2026 · 8 citations
- Consolidation or Adaptation? PRISM: Disentangling SFT and RL Data via Gradient ConcentrationYang Zhao, Yangou Ouyang, Xiao Ding, Hepeng Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- SAT: Balancing Reasoning Accuracy and Efficiency with Stepwise Adaptive ThinkingWeiyang Huang, Xuefeng Bai, Kehai Chen, Xinyang Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
