When Ad Networks Misbehave: Understanding Risks of Semi-Drive-By Splash Ads
Song Wu, Bo Wang, Yifan Zhang, Yinfeng Cao, Xueqiang Wang
Abstract
We investigate the mobile splash ads ecosystem, i.e., full-screen advertisements shown at app launch, where monetization relies on interaction signals that are difficult to verify end-to-end. This ad format is especially sensitive because it sits at the boundary between app startup and user navigation, where incidental touches and sensor-driven callbacks are common yet easy to misattribute as engagement. Prior work has largely framed mobile ad fraud as a publisher-side problem, while a small number of studies have attributed fraudulent operations to embedded ad libraries. Yet a distinct risk remains underexplored in splash advertising: ad SDKs control both how interaction signals are interpreted and how the resulting events are measured and reported, creating an opportunity to reinterpret ambiguous user or device signals as valid advertising interactions.
We uncover a previously less-known form of fraud at the adnetwork layer in which splash ads are triggered not by intentional user actions but by incidental or indirect interactions, a behavior we term semi-drive-by splash ads. By translating non-ad interactions into billable engagement events, ad networks can systematically inflate performance metrics, overcharge advertisers, and erode user trust while providing little or no real user interest.
To expose this behavior in the wild, we design AdHive, an automated honeypot-like analysis framework capable of inducing evasive splash-ad delivery and landing behaviors under realistic device conditions. Unlike traditional VM-based approaches, Ad-Hive reproduces human-like activity through LLM-generated usage traces and sensor dynamics, enabling execution paths that remain hidden under conventional analysis environments.
Our large-scale measurement across thousands of popular Android applications demonstrates that semi-drive-by splash ads are widespread and are often triggered by subtle environmental signals * Song Wu conducted this work while he was a remote intern in Xueqiang Wang's group.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 18f43e5f-b9e5-46e1-87b8-1a6497ff13e4Builds on9
- TriggerScope: Towards Detecting Logic Bombs in Android ApplicationsYanick Fratantonio, Antonio Bianchi, William K. Robertson, Engin Kirda et al.S&P 2016 · 161 citations
- An empirical assessment of security risks of global Android banking appsSen Chen, Lingling Fan, Guozhu Meng, Ting Su et al.ICSE 2020 · 70 citations
- Difuzer: Uncovering Suspicious Hidden Sensitive Operations in Android AppsJordan Samhi, Li Li, Tegawendé F. Bissyandé, Jacques KleinICSE 2022 · 26 citations
- Dissecting Click Fraud Autonomy in the WildTong Zhu, Yan Meng, Haotian Hu, Xiaokuan Zhang et al.CCS 2021 · 14 citations
- Towards Transparent and Stealthy Android OS Sandboxing via Customizable Container-Based VirtualizationWenna Song, Jiang Ming, Lin Jiang, Yi Xiang et al.CCS 2021 · 11 citations
Related papers
- The Abuser Inside Apps: Finding the Culprit Committing Mobile Ad FraudJoongyum Kim, Junghwan Park, Sooel SonNDSS 2021
- When Fun Turns Toxic: A First Look at Aggressive Advertising in Mini-gamesPei Chen, Geng Hong, Yicheng Qin, Huazhe Wang et al.USENIX Security 2026
- “You Are Deceived in the Pocket”: An Exploratory Study of Intrusive Advertisements in Mobile ApplicationsMiaoying Cai, Dongsun Kim, Lingling Fan, Xiangyu Zhang et al.ISSTA 2026
- MadDroid: Characterizing and Detecting Devious Ad Contents for Android AppsTianming Liu, Haoyu Wang, Li Li, Xiapu Luo et al.WWW 2020 · 44 citations
- Are these Ads Safe: Detecting Hidden Attacks through the Mobile App-Web InterfacesVaibhav Rastogi, Rui Shao, Yan Chen, Xiang Pan et al.NDSS 2016 · 81 citations
