The Perception-Robustness Tradeoff in Deterministic Image Restoration
Guy Ohayon, Tomer Michaeli, Michael Elad
Abstract
We study the behavior of deterministic methods for solving inverse problems in imaging. These methods are commonly designed to achieve two goals: (1) attaining high perceptual quality, and (2) generating reconstructions that are consistent with the measurements. We provide a rigorous proof that the better a predictor satisfies these two requirements, the larger its Lipschitz constant must be, regardless of the nature of the degradation involved. In particular, to approach perfect perceptual quality and perfect consistency, the Lipschitz constant of the model must grow to infinity. This implies that such methods are necessarily more susceptible to adversarial attacks. We demonstrate our theory on single image super-resolution algorithms, addressing both noisy and noiseless settings. We also show how this undesired behavior can be leveraged to explore the posterior distribution, thereby allowing the deterministic model to imitate stochastic methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 189321cd-d229-4cb9-b525-09363387f151Cited by top-tier papers4
- Looks Too Good To Be True: An Information-Theoretic Analysis of Hallucinations in Generative Restoration ModelsRegev Cohen, Idan Kligvasser, Ehud Rivlin, Daniel FreedmanNeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Kernel Density Steering: Inference-Time Scaling via Mode Seeking for Image RestorationYuyang Hu, Kangfu Mei, Mojtaba Sahraee-Ardakan, Ulugbek Kamilov et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- Perceptual Fairness in Image RestorationGuy Ohayon, Michael Elad, Tomer MichaeliNeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- FiRe: Fixed-points of Restoration Priors for Solving Inverse ProblemsMatthieu Terris, Ulugbek S. Kamilov, Thomas MoreauCVPR 2025
Builds on11
- DeblurGAN-v2: Deblurring (Orders-of-Magnitude) Faster and BetterOrest Kupyn, Tetiana Martyniuk, Junru Wu, Zhangyang WangICCV 2019 · 1,100 citations
- Designing a Practical Degradation Model for Deep Blind Image Super-ResolutionKai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, Radu TimofteICCV 2021 · 898 citations
- Unfolding the Alternating Optimization for Blind Super ResolutionZhengxiong Luo, Yan Huang, Shang Li, Liang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 348 citations
- Real-World Blind Super-Resolution via Feature Matching with Implicit High-Resolution PriorsChaofeng Chen, Xinyu Shi, Yipeng Qin, Xiaoming Li et al.ACM MM 2022 · 123 citations
- Evaluating Robustness of Deep Image Super-Resolution Against Adversarial AttacksJun-Ho Choi, Huan Zhang, Jun-Hyuk Kim, Cho-Jui Hsieh et al.ICCV 2019 · 82 citations
Related papers
- Reasons for the Superiority of Stochastic Estimators over Deterministic Ones: Robustness, Consistency and Perceptual QualityGuy Ohayon, Theo Joseph Adrai, Michael Elad, Tomer MichaeliICML 2023 · 18 citations
- Tackling the Ill-Posedness of Super-Resolution Through Adaptive Target GenerationYounghyun Jo, Seoung Wug Oh, Peter Vajda, Seon Joo KimCVPR 2021
- Deep Optimal Transport: A Practical Algorithm for Photo-realistic Image RestorationTheo Adrai, Guy Ohayon, Michael Elad, Tomer MichaeliNeurIPS 2023 · 22 citations
- Trainable Nonexpansive Denoisers for Contractive Image ReconstructionArghya Sinha, Aditya Banerjee, Trishit Mukherjee, Kunal Narayan ChaudhuryICML 2026
- Augmenting Perceptual Super-Resolution via Image Quality PredictorsFengjia Zhang, Samrudhdhi B. Rangrej, Tristan Aumentado-Armstrong, Afsaneh Fazly et al.CVPR 2025
