Greedy Sampling Is Provably Efficient For RLHF
Di Wu, Chengshuai Shi, Jing Yang, Cong Shen
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a key technique for post-training large language models. Despite its empirical success, the theoretical understanding of RLHF is still limited, as learning the KL-regularized target with only preference feedback poses additional challenges compared with canonical RL. Existing works mostly study the reward-based Bradley-Terry (BT) preference model, and extend classical designs utilizing optimism or pessimism. This work, instead, considers the general preference model (whose practical relevance has been observed recently) and obtains performance guarantees with major, order-wise improvements over existing ones. Surprisingly, these results are derived from algorithms that directly use the empirical estimates (i.e., greedy sampling), as opposed to constructing optimistic or pessimistic estimates in previous works. This insight has a deep root in the unique structural property of the optimal policy class under the KL-regularized target, and we further specialize it to the BT model, highlighting the surprising sufficiency of greedy sampling in RLHF.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1866301c-c92e-456e-a4f8-9f7babdf5099Cited by top-tier papers2
- Near-Optimal Regret for KL-Regularized Multi-Armed BanditsKaixuan Ji, Qingyue Zhao, Heyang Zhao, Qiwei Di et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- -Divergence Regularized RLHF: Two Tales of Sampling and Unified AnalysesDi Wu, Chengshuai Shi, Jing Yang, Cong ShenICML 2026
Builds on29
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
Related papers
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference ModelChenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Hanze Dong et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Zeroth-Order Policy Gradient for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback without Reward InferenceQining Zhang, Lei YingICLR 2025
- A Regret Minimization Framework on Preference Learning in Large Language ModelsSuhwan Kim, Taehyun Cho, Youngsoo Jang, Geon-Hyeong Kim et al.ICML 2026
- Improving LLM General Preference Alignment via Optimistic Online Mirror DescentYuheng Zhang, Dian Yu, Tao Ge, Linfeng Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
