Understanding and Benchmarking the Impact of GDPR on Database Systems
Supreeth Shastri, Vinay Banakar, Melissa Wasserman, Arun Kumar, Vijay Chidambaram
Abstract
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides new rights and protections to European people concerning their personal data. We analyze GDPR from a systems perspective, translating its legal articles into a set of capabilities and characteristics that compliant systems must support. Our analysis reveals the phenomenon of metadata explosion, wherein large quantities of metadata needs to be stored along with the personal data to satisfy the GDPR requirements. Our analysis also helps us identify new workloads that must be supported under GDPR. We design and implement an open-source benchmark called GDPRbench that consists of workloads and metrics needed to understand and assess personal-data processing database systems. To gauge the readiness of modern database systems for GDPR, we follow best practices and developer recommendations to modify Redis, PostgreSQL, and a commercial database system to be GDPR compliant. Our experiments demonstrate that the resulting GDPR-compliant systems achieve poor performance on GPDR workloads, and that performance scales poorly as the volume of personal data increases. We discuss the real-world implications of these .ndings, and identify research challenges towards making GDPR-compliance efficient in production environments. We release all of our so.ware artifacts and datasets at h.p://www:gdprbench:org
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1851cf2d-07ef-4e7f-a964-f013221ec8efCited by top-tier papers21
- Federated Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental StudyQinbin Li, Yiqun Diao, Quan Chen, Bingsheng HeICDE 2022 · 1,110 citations
- HedgeCut: Maintaining Randomised Trees for Low-Latency Machine UnlearningSebastian Schelter, Stefan Grafberger, Ted DunningSIGMOD 2021 · 89 citations
- Software-Defined Data Protection: Low Overhead Policy Compliance at the Storage Layer is Within Reach!Zsolt István, Soujanya Ponnapalli, Vijay ChidambaramVLDB 2021 · 19 citations
- Retrofitting GDPR Compliance onto Legacy DatabasesArchita Agarwal, Marilyn George, Aaron R. Jeyaraj, Malte SchwarzkopfVLDB 2022 · 16 citations
- SoK: Technical Implementation and Human Impact of Internet Privacy RegulationsEleanor Birrell, Jay Rodolitz, Angel Ding, Jenna Lee et al.S&P 2024 · 11 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- K9db: Privacy-Compliant Storage For Web Applications By ConstructionKinan Dak Albab, Ishan Sharma, Justus Adam, Benjamin Kilimnik et al.OSDI 2023 · 7 citations
- GDPRuler: A Trusted GDPR Monitor for Cloud Data SystemsDimitrios Stavrakakis, Masanori Misono, Julian Pritzi, Harshavardhan Unnibhavi et al.CCS 2026
- RuleKeeper: GDPR-Aware Personal Data Compliance for Web FrameworksMafalda Ferreira, Tiago Brito, José Fragoso Santos, Nuno SantosS&P 2023
- TAOBench: An End-to-End Benchmark for Social Networking WorkloadsAudrey Cheng, Xiao Shi, Aaron N. Kabcenell, Shilpa Lawande et al.VLDB 2022 · 20 citations
- The UDFBench Benchmark for General-purpose UDF QueriesYannis Foufoulas, Theoni Palaiologou, Alkis SimitsisVLDB 2025
