DR-Arena: an Automated Evaluation Framework for Deep Research Agents
Yiwen Gao, Ruochen Zhao, Yang Deng, Wenxuan Zhang
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly operate as Deep Research (DR) Agents capable of autonomous investigation and information synthesis, reliable evaluation of their task performance has become a critical bottleneck. Current benchmarks predominantly rely on static datasets, which suffer from several limitations: limited task generality, temporal misalignment, and data contamination. To address these, we introduce DR-Arena, a fully automated evaluation framework that pushes DR agents to their capability limits through dynamic investigation. DR-Arena constructs real-time Information Trees from fresh web trends to ensure the evaluation rubric is synchronized with the live world state, and employs an automated Examiner to generate structured tasks testing two orthogonal capabilities: Deep reasoning and Wide coverage. DR-Arena further adopts Adaptive Evolvement Loop, a state-machine controller that dynamically escalates task complexity based on real-time performance, demanding deeper deduction or wider aggregation until a decisive capability boundary emerges. Experiments with six advanced DR agents demonstrate that DR-Arena achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.94 with the LM-SYS Search Arena leaderboard. This represents state-of-the-art alignment with human preferences without any manual efforts, validating DR-Arena as a reliable alternative for costly human adjudication. Deep Research (DR) agents, such as OpenAI Deep Research (OpenAI, 2025) and Perplexity Deep Research (Perplexity AI, 2025), have rapidly gained adoption and are now widely used for complex information-seeking tasks. Unlike traditional search engines where users need to browse multiple websites manually, DR agents act as autonomous * Equal contribution. † Corresponding author.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 181c8c16-fe72-4b2f-928c-5ea694c5d35dBuilds on9
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research AgentsMingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Licheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
- WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-SeekingRyan Wong, Jiawei Wang, Junjie Zhao, Li Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 66 citations
- Auto-Arena: Automating LLM Evaluations with Agent Peer Battles and Committee DiscussionsRuochen Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Yew Ken Chia, Weiwen Xu et al.ACL 2025 · 34 citations
- Search Arena: Analyzing Search-Augmented LLMsMihran Miroyan, Tsung-Han Wu, Logan King, Tianle Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 32 citations
Related papers
- ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research AgentsManasi Sharma, Chen Bo Calvin Zhang, Chaithanya Bandi, Clinton Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 83 citations
- Characterizing Deep Research: A Benchmark and Formal DefinitionAbhinav Java, Ashmit Khandelwal, Sukruta Prakash Midigeshi, Aaron Halfaker et al.ICLR 2026 · 30 citations
- DRBench: A Realistic Benchmark for Enterprise Deep ResearchAmirhossein Abaskohi, Tianyi Chen, Miguel Muñoz-Mármol, Curtis Fox et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- Hunt Instead of Wait: Evaluating Deep Data Research on Large Language ModelsWei Liu, Peijie Yu, Michele Orini, Yali Du et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- IntentRL: Training Proactive User-intent Agents for Open-ended Deep Research via Reinforcement LearningHaohao Luo, Zexi Li, Yuexiang Xie, Wenhao Zhang et al.ICML 2026
