TapSampling: Inference-Time Sampling with a Task-Progress-Understanding Verifier for Robotic Manipulation
Sizhe Zhao, Shengping Zhang, Shuo Yang, Weiyu Zhao, Shuigen Wang, Xiangyang Ji
Abstract
Existing embodied control research demonstrates remarkable performance improvements by scaling training data and model size. We instead explore inference-time strategy as an alternative axis. Non-deterministic generative models, such as diffusion and autoregressive models, have been widely adopted in the field of embodied control. However, the single-shot inference paradigm limits their performance. In this paper, we propose TapSampling , a plug-and-play framework for inference-time sampling. First, we introduce an Action-VAE that represents actions in a low-dimensional latent space by mapping policy-generated initial actions into a compressed posterior distribution, from which any number of latent samples can be drawn and decoded into candidate actions that approximate the true action distribution. Second, we formulate action verification as task-progress outcome prediction, using the intrinsic sequential structure of robotic datasets to train a semantically grounded verifier for interpretable action selection. Furthermore, TapSampling is a policy-agnostic framework. Extensive experiments in both simulated and real-world environments demonstrate that our method substantially improves multiple generalist policies without further policy finetuning. Code and models are available at the project page (https://aipixel.github.io/TapSampling/).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 181135b4-c692-437d-9b3f-6df6078ddf04Builds on19
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Vision-Language Foundation Models as Effective Robot ImitatorsXinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hanbo Zhang, Cunjun Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 375 citations
Related papers
- Masked Generative Policy for Robotic ControlLipeng Zhuang, Shiyu Fan, Florent P. Audonnet, Yingdong Ru et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Two-Steps Diffusion Policy for Robotic Manipulation via Genetic DenoisingMateo Clémente, Leo Maxime Brunswic, Rui Heng Yang, Xuan Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Efficient Planning in a Compact Latent Action SpaceZhengyao Jiang, Tianjun Zhang, Michael Janner, Yueying Li et al.ICLR 2023 · 3 citations
- VITA: Vision-to-Action Flow Matching PolicyDechen Gao, BOQI ZHAO, Andrew Lee, Ian Chuang et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
- FM-Steer: Enhance Generalist Policies with Value-Guided Cascaded DenoisingHaoming Song, Delin Qu, Yuanqi Yao, Qizhi Chen et al.CVPR 2026
