Convergent Differential Privacy Analysis for General Federated Learning
Yan Sun, Qixin Zhang, Li Shen, Dacheng Tao
Abstract
The powerful cooperation of federated learning (FL) and differential privacy (DP) provides a promising paradigm for the large-scale private clients. However, existing analyses in FL-DP mostly rely on the composition theorem and cannot tightly quantify the privacy leakage challenges, which is tight for a few communication rounds but yields an arbitrarily loose and divergent bound eventually. This also implies a counterintuitive judgment, suggesting that FL-DP may not provide adequate privacy support during long-term training under constant-level noisy perturbations, yielding discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental results. To further investigate the convergent privacy and reliability of the FL-DP framework, in this paper, we comprehensively evaluate the worst privacy of two classical methods under the non-convex and smooth objectives based on the f -DP analysis. With the aid of the shifted interpolation technique, we successfully prove that privacy in Noisy-FedAvg has a tight convergent bound. Moreover, with the regularization of the proxy term, privacy in Noisy-FedProx has a stable constant lower bound. Our analysis further demonstrates a solid theoretical foundation for the reliability of privacy in FL-DP. Meanwhile, our conclusions can also be losslessly converted to other classical DP analytical frameworks, e.g. (ϵ, δ)-DP and Rényi-DP (RDP), to provide more fine-grained understandings for the FL-DP frameworks. * Equal contribution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 17fab7b6-68d2-4850-b3f2-5bc7cbcab645Builds on28
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Don't Use Large Mini-batches, Use Local SGDTao Lin, Sebastian U. Stich, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Martin JaggiICLR 2020 · 462 citations
- Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?Blake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Sebastian U. Stich, Zhen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 277 citations
Related papers
- Understanding Clipping for Federated Learning: Convergence and Client-Level Differential PrivacyXinwei Zhang, Xiangyi Chen, Mingyi Hong, Steven Wu et al.ICML 2022 · 134 citations
- Shifted Interpolation for Differential PrivacyJinho Bok, Weijie J. Su, Jason M. AltschulerICML 2024 · 12 citations
- Towards the Robustness of Differentially Private Federated LearningTao Qi, Huili Wang, Yongfeng HuangAAAI 2024 · 30 citations
- Clients Collaborate: Flexible Differentially Private Federated Learning with Guaranteed Improvement of Utility-Privacy Trade-offYuecheng Li, Lele Fu, Tong Wang, Jian Lou et al.ICML 2025
- Lightweight Federated Learning with Differential Privacy and Straggler ResilienceShu Hong, Xiaojun Lin, Lingjie DuanINFOCOM 2025 · 7 citations
