Co-Designed Architectures for Modular Superconducting Quantum Computers
Evan McKinney, Mingkang Xia, Chao Zhou, Pinlei Lu, Michael Hatridge, Alex K. Jones
Abstract
Noisy, Intermediate Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers have reached the point where they can show the potential for quantum advantage over classical computing. Unfortunately, NISQ machines introduce sufficient noise that even for moderate size quantum circuits the results can be unreliable. We propose a collaboratively designed superconducting quantum computer using a Superconducting Nonlinear Asymmetric Inductive eLement (SNAIL) modulator. The SNAIL modulator is designed by considering both the ideal fundamental qubit gate operation while maximizing the qubit coupling capabilities. First, the SNAIL natively implements gates realized through proportionally scaled pulse lengths. This naturally includes , which provides an advantage over CNOT as a basis gate. Second, the SNAIL enables high-degree couplings that allow rich and highly parallel qubit connection topologies without suffering from frequency crowding. Building on our previously demonstrated SNAIL-based quantum state router we propose a quantum 4-ary tree and a hypercube inspired corral built from interconnected quantum modules. We compare their advantage in data movement based on necessary SWAP gates to the traditional lattice and heavy-hex lattice used in latest commercial quantum computers. We demonstrate the co-design advantage of our SNAIL-based machine with basis gates and rich topologies against CNOT/heavy-hex and FSIM/lattice for 16-20 qubit and extrapolated designs circa 80 qubit architectures. We compare total circuit time and total gate count to understand fidelity for systems dominated by decoherence and control imperfections, respectively. Finally, we provide a gate duration sensitivity study on further decreasing the SNAIL pulse length to realize qubit systems to reduce decoherence times.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- MIRAGE: Quantum Circuit Decomposition and Routing Collaborative Design Using Mirror GatesEvan McKinney, Michael Hatridge, Alex K. JonesHPCA 2024 · 4 citations
- Synchronization for Fault-Tolerant Quantum ComputersSatvik Maurya, Swamit TannuISCA 2025 · 4 citations
- Parallel Driving for Fast Quantum Computing Under Speed LimitsEvan McKinney, Chao Zhou, Mingkang Xia, Michael Hatridge et al.ISCA 2023 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- SupermarQ: A Scalable Quantum Benchmark SuiteTeague Tomesh, Pranav Gokhale, Victory Omole, Gokul Subramanian Ravi et al.HPCA 2022 · 132 citations
- Designing Calibration and Expressivity-Efficient Instruction Sets for Quantum ComputingLingling Lao, Prakash Murali, Margaret Martonosi, Dan E. BrowneISCA 2021 · 23 citations
Related papers
- DDRoute: a Novel Depth-Driven Approach to the Qubit Routing ProblemAlessandro Annechini, Marco Venere, Donatella Sciuto, Marco D. SantambrogioDAC 2025 · 2 citations
- Not All SWAPs Have the Same Cost: A Case for Optimization-Aware Qubit RoutingJi Liu, Peiyi Li, Huiyang ZhouHPCA 2022 · 30 citations
- Unifying Qubit Routing Across Diverse Quantum ISAs via Canonical RepresentationZhaohui Yang, Kai Zhang, Xinyang Tian, Xiangyu Ren et al.ISCA 2026 · 1 citation
- Systematic Crosstalk Mitigation for Superconducting Qubits via Frequency-Aware CompilationYongshan Ding, Pranav Gokhale, Sophia Fuhui Lin, Richard Rines et al.MICRO 2020 · 67 citations
- SQUARE: Strategic Quantum Ancilla Reuse for Modular Quantum Programs via Cost-Effective UncomputationYongshan Ding, Xin-Chuan Wu, Adam Holmes, Ash Wiseth et al.ISCA 2020 · 33 citations
