Revisiting Gendered Web Forms: An Evaluation of Gender Inputs with (Non-)Binary People
Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jialun Aaron Jiang, Katta Spiel, Jed R. Brubaker
Abstract
Gender input forms act as gates to accessing information, websites, and services online. Non-binary people regularly have to interact with them, though many do not offer non-binary gender options. This results in non-binary individuals having to either choose an incorrect gender category or refrain from using a site or service-which is occasionally infeasible (e.g., when accessing health services).
We tested five different forms through a survey with binary and non-binary participants (n = 350) in three contexts-a digital health form, a social media website, and a dating app. Our results indicate that the majority of participants found binary "male or female" forms exclusive and uncomfortable to fill out across all contexts. We conclude with design considerations for improving gender input forms and consequently their underlying gender model in databases. Our work aims to sensitize designers of (online) gender web forms to the needs and desires of non-binary people.
CCS Concepts: • Social and professional topics → Gender; • Human-centered computing → User interface design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 17bf54bf-648f-48cb-91a4-63ffb3ec541eCited by top-tier papers10
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- Harms of Gender Exclusivity and Challenges in Non-Binary Representation in Language TechnologiesSunipa Dev, Masoud Monajatipoor, Anaelia Ovalle, Arjun Subramonian et al.EMNLP 2021 · 113 citations
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Overwriting Pretrained Bias with Finetuning DataAngelina Wang, Olga RussakovskyICCV 2023 · 50 citations
- Subgroup Robustness Grows On Trees: An Empirical Baseline InvestigationJosh Gardner, Zoran Popovic, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- A Playbook to be Proud of: Making the Case for LGBTQ+ Inclusive User Account DesignBeatrice Fadrigon, Princess Gordon, Jane Lupica, Morgan G. AmesCHI 2024 · 5 citations
- Representation on Our Terms: How Trans and Gender Diverse People Prioritize Inclusivity in University Information SystemsDrew N. Kirks-Cler, Megh MaratheCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- You Keep Using That Word: Ways of Thinking about Gender in Computing ResearchOs Keyes, Chandler May, Annabelle CarrellCSCW 2021 · 33 citations
- Beyond the Boolean: How Programmers Ask About, Use, and Discuss GenderElijah Robert Bouma-Sims, Yasemin AcarCSCW 2023 · 10 citations
- Diagnosing Bias in the Gender Representation of HCI Research Participants: How it Happens and Where We AreAnna Offenwanger, Alan John Milligan, Minsuk Chang, Julia Bullard et al.CHI 2021 · 51 citations
