Lune

SODA2020Top-tier venue

Round Complexity of Common Randomness Generation: The Amortized Setting

Noah Golowich, Madhu Sudan

2020Year
5Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

In this work we study the effect of rounds of interaction on the common randomness generation (CRG) problem. In the CRG problem, two parties, Alice and Bob, receive samples X i and Y i , respectively, where (X i , Y i ) are drawn jointly from a source distribution µ. The two parties wish to agree on a common random key consisting of many bits of randomness, by exchanging messages that depend on each party's respective input and the previous messages. In this work we study the amortized version of the problem, i.e., the number of bits of communication needed per random bit output by Alice and Bob, in the limit as the number of bits generated tends to infinity. The amortized version of the CRG problem has been extensively studied in the information theory literature, though very little was known about the effect of interaction on this problem. Recently Bafna et al. (SODA 2019) considered the non-amortized version of the problem (so here the goal of the interaction is to generate a fixed number of random bits): they gave a family of sources µ r,n parameterized by r, n ∈ N, such that with r + 2 rounds of communication one can generate n bits of common randomness with this source with O(r log n) communication, whereas with roughly r/2 rounds the communication complexity is Ω(n/ poly log n). Note in particular that their source is designed with the target number of bits in mind and hence the result does not apply to the amortized setting.

In this work we strengthen the work of Bafna et al. in two ways: First we show that the results extend to the classical amortized setting. We also reduce the gap between the round complexity in the upper and lower bounds to an additive constant. Specifically we show that for every pair r, n ∈ N the (amortized) communication complexity to generate Ω(n) bits of common randomness from the source µ r,n using r + 2 rounds of communication is O(r log n) whereas the amortized communication required to generate the same amount of randomness from r rounds is Ω( √ n). Our techniques exploit known connections between information complexity and CRG, and the main novelty is our ability to analyze the information complexity of protocols getting inputs from the source µ r,n .

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 179ff3d9-2064-4dc8-a9c4-cbb579c5a583

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines