Lune

ACL2024Top-tier venue

DocMath-Eval: Evaluating Math Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs in Understanding Financial Documents

Yilun Zhao, Yitao Long, Hongjun Liu, Ryo Kamoi, Linyong Nan, Lyuhao Chen, Yixin Liu, Xiangru Tang, Rui Zhang, Arman Cohan

2024Year
8Citations
9Top-tier citations

Abstract

Recent LLMs have demonstrated remarkable performance in solving exam-like math word problems. However, the degree to which these numerical reasoning skills are effective in real-world scenarios, particularly in expert domains, is still largely unexplored. This paper introduces DOCMATH-EVAL, a comprehensive benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the numerical reasoning capabilities of LLMs in the context of understanding and analyzing specialized documents containing both text and tables. We conduct an extensive evaluation of 48 LLMs using Chainof-Thought and Program-of-Thought prompting techniques, aiming to comprehensively assess the capabilities and limitations of existing LLMs in DOCMATH-EVAL. We found that even the current best-performing system (i.e., GPT-4o) still significantly lags behind human experts in solving complex numerical reasoning problems grounded in long contexts. We believe that DOCMATH-EVAL can serve as a valuable benchmark for evaluating LLMs' capabilities in solving challenging numerical reasoning problems within expert domains.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 178cfa6a-3267-40b5-8417-54d52b0e8a25

Cited by top-tier papers9

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on9

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines