Balls and Bins and the Infinite Process with Random Deletions
Petra Berenbrink, Tom Friedetzky, Peter Kling, Lars Nagel
Abstract
We consider an infinite balls-into-bins process with deletions where in each discrete step t a coin is tossed as to whether, with probability β(t) ∈ (0, 1), a new ball is allocated using the Greedy[2] strategy (which places the ball in the lower loaded of two bins sampled uniformly at random) or, with remaining probability 1 -β(t), a ball is deleted from a non-empty bin chosen uniformly at random. Let n be the number of bins and m(t) the total load at time t. We are interested in bounding the discrepancy x max (t) -m(t)/n (current maximum load relative to current average) and the overload x max (t) -m max (t)/n (current maximum load relative to highest average observed so far).
We prove that at an arbitrarily chosen time t the total number of balls above the average is O(n) and that the discrepancy is O(log(n)). For the discrepancy, we provide a matching lower bound. Furthermore we prove that at an arbitrarily chosen time t the overload is log log(n) + O(1). For "good" insertion probability sequences (in which the average load of time intervals with polynomial length increases in expectation) we show that even the discrepancy is bounded by log log(n) + O(1).
One of our main analytical tools is a layered induction, as per [ABKU99]. Since our model allows for rather more general scenarios than what was previously considered, the formal analysis requires some extra ingredients as well, in particular a detailed potential analysis. Furthermore, we simplify the setup by applying probabilistic couplings to obtain certain "recovery" properties, which eliminate much of the need for intricate and careful conditioning elsewhere in the analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 172cd876-8f02-43dd-aad7-6c80cd12368eBuilds on4
- Tiny PointersMichael A. Bender, Alex Conway, Martin Farach-Colton, William Kuszmaul et al.SODA 2023 · 11 citations
- Balanced Allocations: Caching and Packing, Twinning and ThinningDimitrios Los, Thomas Sauerwald, John SylvesterSODA 2022 · 8 citations
- Balanced Allocations: The Heavily Loaded Case with DeletionsNikhil Bansal, William KuszmaulFOCS 2022 · 6 citations
- Balanced Allocations with Heterogeneous Bins: The Power of MemoryDimitrios Los, Thomas Sauerwald, John SylvesterSODA 2023 · 5 citations
Related papers
- History-Independent Load BalancingMichael A. Bender, William Kuszmaul, Elaine Shi, Rose SilverSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- The power of two choices in graphical allocationNikhil Bansal, Ohad N. FeldheimSTOC 2022 · 5 citations
- Load balancing with dynamic set of balls and binsAnders Aamand, Jakob Bæk Tejs Knudsen, Mikkel ThorupSTOC 2021 · 4 citations
- Linear Hashing Is OptimalMichael Jaber, Vinayak M. Kumar, David ZuckermanSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Robust Load Balancing with Machine Learned AdviceSara Ahmadian, Hossein Esfandiari, Vahab S. Mirrokni, Binghui PengSODA 2022 · 5 citations
