Visualization According to Statisticians: An Interview Study on the Role of Visualization for Inferential Statistics
Eric Newburger, Niklas Elmqvist
Abstract
Statisticians are not only one of the earliest professional adopters of data visualization, but also some of its most prolific users. Understanding how these professionals utilize visual representations in their analytic process may shed light on best practices for visual sensemaking. We present results from an interview study involving 18 professional statisticians (19.7 years average in the profession) on three aspects: (1) their use of visualization in their daily analytic work; (2) their mental models of inferential statistical processes; and
(3) their design recommendations for how to best represent statistical inferences. Interview sessions consisted of discussing inferential statistics, eliciting participant sketches of suitable visual designs, and finally, a design intervention with our proposed visual designs. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis and open coding, deriving thematic codes on statistical mindset, analytic process, and analytic toolkit. The key findings for each aspect are as follows:
(1) statisticians make extensive use of visualization during all phases of their work (and not just when reporting results); (2) their mental models of inferential methods tend to be mostly visually based; and (3) many statisticians abhor dichotomous thinking. The latter suggests that a multi-faceted visual display of inferential statistics that includes a visual indicator of analytically important effect sizes may help to balance the attributed epistemic power of traditional statistical testing with an awareness of the uncertainty of sensemaking.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 17265081-c031-4eee-993e-3b19e7de0c56Cited by top-tier papers3
- What-if Analysis for Business Professionals: Current Practices and Future OpportunitiesSneha Gathani, Zhicheng Liu, Peter J. Haas, Çagatay DemiralpCHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Qualitative Study for LLM-assisted Design Study Process: Strategies, Challenges, and RolesShaolun Ruan, Rui Sheng, Xiaolin Wen, Jiachen Wang et al.IEEE VIS 2025 · 2 citations
- Cartographers in Cubicles: How Training and Preferences of Mapmakers Interplay with Structures and Norms in Not-for-Profit OrganizationsArpit Narechania, Alex Endert, Clio AndrisCSCW 2025
Builds on2
- How Visualizing Inferential Uncertainty Can Mislead Readers About Treatment Effects in Scientific ResultsJake M. Hofman, Daniel G. Goldstein, Jessica HullmanCHI 2020 · 83 citations
- Untidy Data: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of TablesLyn Bartram, Michael Correll, Melanie ToryIEEE VIS 2021 · 56 citations
Related papers
- How Visualization Designers Perceive and Use InspirationAli Baigelenov, Prakash Shukla, Paul ParsonsCHI 2025 · 6 citations
- Understanding Data Visualization Design PracticePaul ParsonsIEEE VIS 2021 · 53 citations
- Visual Reasoning Strategies for Effect Size Judgments and DecisionsAlex Kale, Matthew Kay, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 112 citations
- Designing for Ambiguity in Visual Analytics: Lessons from Risk Assessment and PredictionStanislaw Nowak, Lyn BartramIEEE VIS 2023 · 9 citations
- Bayesian-Assisted Inference from Visualized DataYea-Seul Kim, Paula Kayongo, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Jessica HullmanIEEE VIS 2020 · 40 citations
