A Rose by Any Other Name would not Smell as Sweet: Social Bias in Names Mistranslation
Sandra Sandoval, Jieyu Zhao, Marine Carpuat, Hal Daumé III
Abstract
We ask the question: Are there widespread disparities in machine translations of names across race/ethnicity, and gender? We hypothesize that the translation quality of names and surrounding context will be lower for names associated with US racial and ethnic minorities due to these systems’ tendencies to standardize language to predominant language patterns. We develop a dataset of names that are strongly demographically aligned and propose a translation evaluation procedure based on round-trip translation. We analyze the effect of name demographics on translation quality using generalized linear mixed effects models and find that the ability of translation systems to correctly translate female-associated names is significantly lower than male-associated names. This effect is particularly pronounced for female-associated names that are also associated with racial (Black) and ethnic (Hispanic) minorities. This disparity in translation quality between social groups for something as personal as someone’s name has significant implications for people’s professional, personal, and cultural identities, self-worth and ease of communication. Our findings suggest that more MT research is needed to improve the translation of names and to provide high-quality service for users regardless of gender, race, and ethnicity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 166ab780-3b00-4a30-9a19-3c06f0184a2cCited by top-tier papers8
- Towards Measuring and Modeling "Culture" in LLMs: A SurveyMuhammad Farid Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Singh et al.EMNLP 2024 · 21 citations
- Metrics for What, Metrics for Whom: Assessing Actionability of Bias Evaluation Metrics in NLPPieter Delobelle, Giuseppe Attanasio, Debora Nozza, Su Lin Blodgett et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- An Interdisciplinary Approach to Human-Centered Machine TranslationMarine Carpuat, Omri Asscher, Kalika Bali, Luisa Bentivogli et al.EMNLP 2025 · 2 citations
- What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered StudyBeatrice Savoldi, Sara Papi, Matteo Negri, Ana Guerberof Arenas et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- TALES: A Taxonomy and Analysis of Cultural Representations in LLM-generated StoriesKirti Bhagat, Shaily Bhatt, Athul Velagapudi, Aditya Vashistha et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Measuring and Mitigating Name Biases in Neural Machine TranslationJun Wang, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Trevor CohnACL 2022 · 31 citations
- MT-GenEval: A Counterfactual and Contextual Dataset for Evaluating Gender Accuracy in Machine TranslationAnna Currey, Maria Nadejde, Raghavendra Reddy Pappagari, Mia Mayer et al.EMNLP 2022 · 22 citations
- Multilingual Holistic Bias: Extending Descriptors and Patterns to Unveil Demographic Biases in Languages at ScaleMarta R. Costa-jussà, Pierre Andrews, Eric Michael Smith, Prangthip Hansanti et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
- Investigating Failures of Automatic Translationin the Case of Unambiguous GenderAdi Renduchintala, Adina WilliamsACL 2022 · 28 citations
- Low Frequency Names Exhibit Bias and Overfitting in Contextualizing Language ModelsRobert Wolfe, Aylin CaliskanEMNLP 2021 · 27 citations
