CROM: Continuous Reduced-Order Modeling of PDEs Using Implicit Neural Representations
Peter Yichen Chen, Jinxu Xiang, Dong Heon Cho, Yue Chang, G. A. Pershing, Henrique Teles Maia, Maurizio M. Chiaramonte, Kevin T. Carlberg, Eitan Grinspun
Abstract
The long runtime of high-fidelity partial differential equation (PDE) solvers makes them unsuitable for time-critical applications. We propose to accelerate PDE solvers using reduced-order modeling (ROM). Whereas prior ROM approaches reduce the dimensionality of discretized vector fields, our continuous reduced-order modeling (CROM) approach builds a low-dimensional embedding of the continuous vector fields themselves, not their discretization. We represent this reduced manifold using continuously differentiable neural fields, which may train on any and all available numerical solutions of the continuous system, even when they are obtained using diverse methods or discretizations. We validate our approach on an extensive range of PDEs with training data from voxel grids, meshes, and point clouds. Compared to prior discretization-dependent ROM methods, such as linear subspace proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and nonlinear manifold neural-network-based autoencoders, CROM features higher accuracy, lower memory consumption, dynamically adaptive resolutions, and applicability to any discretization. For equal latent space dimension, CROM exhibits 79 and 49 better accuracy, and 39 and 132 smaller memory footprint, than POD and autoencoder methods, respectively. Experiments demonstrate 109 and 89 wall-clock speedups over unreduced models on CPUs and GPUs, respectively. Videos and codes are available on the project page: https://crom-pde.github.io
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1617f3a8-386f-43b7-bd22-d5a0e7f8c0aaCited by top-tier papers21
- Simplicits: Mesh-Free, Geometry-Agnostic Elastic SimulationVismay Modi, Nicholas Sharp, Or Perel, Shinjiro Sueda et al.SIGGRAPH 2024 · 23 citations
- Lost in Latent Space: An Empirical Study of Latent Diffusion Models for Physics EmulationFrançois Rozet, Ruben Ohana, Michael McCabe, Gilles Louppe et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- CoLoRA: Continuous low-rank adaptation for reduced implicit neural modeling of parameterized partial differential equationsJules Berman, Benjamin PeherstorferICML 2024 · 17 citations
- Continuous PDE Dynamics Forecasting with Implicit Neural RepresentationsYuan Yin, Matthieu Kirchmeyer, Jean-Yves Franceschi, Alain Rakotomamonjy et al.ICLR 2023 · 14 citations
- Vectorized Conditional Neural Fields: A Framework for Solving Time-dependent Parametric Partial Differential EquationsJan Hagnberger, Marimuthu Kalimuthu, Daniel Musekamp, Mathias NiepertICML 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Physics-informed Reduced Order Modeling of Time-dependent PDEs via Differentiable SolversNima Hosseini Dashtbayaz, Hesam Salehipour, Adrian Butscher, Nigel MorrisNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- AROMA: Preserving Spatial Structure for Latent PDE Modeling with Local Neural FieldsLouis Serrano, Thomas X. Wang, Etienne Le Naour, Jean-Noël Vittaut et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 47 citations
- CALM-PDE: Continuous and Adaptive Convolutions for Latent Space Modeling of Time-dependent PDEsJan Hagnberger, Daniel Musekamp, Mathias NiepertNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- CFO: Learning Continuous-Time PDE Dynamics via Flow-Matched Neural OperatorsXianglong Hou, Xinquan Huang, Paris PerdikarisICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- OrthoSolver: A Neural Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Solver For PDEsYing Pang, Jingyuan Wang, Jiahao Ji, Fanhao MuICLR 2026
