Lune

ACL Findings2026

PhysPRM: A Generative Process Reward Model with Fine-grained Diagnosis for Physics Problem Solving

Yuxuan Dong, Xinyu Zhang, Lingling Zhang, Han Lai, Pengyu Li, Bifan Wei, Yaqiang Wu, Jun Liu

Abstract

Despite the remarkable progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) in abstract reasoning tasks, they continue to struggle with physics problem solving due to difficulties in decoding implicit constraints and maintaining physical consistency. To address these challenges, Process Reward Models (PRMs) have emerged as a promising approach to verify intermediate reasoning steps. Existing PRMs attempt to mitigate reasoning errors but typically rely on scalar scoring, which lacks the explanatory power necessary to diagnose complex physical misconceptions. In this work, we introduce PhysPRM, a Generative PRM that treats evaluation as a generative task to produce fine-grained diagnoses comprising critiques, final judgments, and specific error types. To facilitate this, we develop an automated data synthesis pipeline to construct PhysPRM30K, a comprehensive training dataset, and PhysProcessBench, a rigorously human-verified benchmark. By employing a two-stage training paradigm that integrates Supervised Fine-Tuning with Group Relative Policy Optimization, PhysPRM significantly enhances the physics reasoning capabilities of various LLMs. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PhysPRM boosts performance by up to 8.9 and 10.3 points in Best-of-N and critique refinement strategies, respectively. 1

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on16

  1. Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
  2. Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
  3. VisualPRM400K: An Effective Dataset for Training Multimodal Process Reward ModelsWeiyun Wang, Zhangwei Gao, Lianjie Chen, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 110 citations
  4. GenPRM: Scaling Test-Time Compute of Process Reward Models via Generative ReasoningJian Zhao, Runze Liu, Kaiyan Zhang, Zhimu Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 68 citations
  5. PhysReason: A Comprehensive Benchmark towards Physics-Based ReasoningXinyu Zhang, Yuxuan Dong, Yanrui Wu, Jiaxing Huang et al.ACL 2025 · 51 citations

Related papers

  1. PRMBench: A Fine-grained and Challenging Benchmark for Process-Level Reward ModelsMingyang Song, Zhaochen Su, Xiaoye Qu, Jiawei Zhou et al.ACL 2025 · 85 citations
  2. PRISM-Physics: Causal DAG-Based Process Evaluation for Physics ReasoningWanjia Zhao, Qinwei Ma, Jingzhe Shi, Shirley Wu et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
  3. Adversarial Training for Process Reward ModelsGurusha Juneja, Deepak Nathani, William WangICML 2026 · 2 citations
  4. Benchmarking Fine-Grained Error Detection in Multimodal ReasoningChi-Min Chan, Han Zhu, Chunyang Jiang, Jiaming Ji et al.ACL 2026
  5. R-PRM: Reasoning-Driven Process Reward ModelingShuaijie She, Junxiao Liu, Yifeng Liu, Jiajun Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines