USENIX Security2016Top-tier venue
Authenticated Network Time Synchronization
Benjamin Dowling, Douglas Stebila, Greg Zaverucha
Abstract
The Network Time Protocol (NTP) is used by many network-connected devices to synchronize device time with remote servers. Many security features depend on the device knowing the current time, for example in deciding whether a certificate is still valid. Currently, most services implement NTP without authentication, and the authentication mechanisms available in the standard have not been formally analyzed, require a pre-shared key, or are known to have cryptographic weaknesses. In this paper we present an authenticated version of NTP, called ANTP, to protect against desynchronization attacks. To make ANTP suitable for large-scale deployments, it is designed to minimize server-side public key operations by infrequently performing a key exchange using public key cryptography, then relying solely on symmetric cryptography for subsequent time synchronization requests; moreover, it does so without requiring server-side per-connection state. Additionally, ANTP ensures that authentication does not degrade accuracy of time synchronization. We measured the performance of ANTP by implementing it in OpenNTPD using OpenSSL. Compared to plain NTP, ANTP's symmetric crypto reduces the server throughput (connections/second) for time synchronization requests by a factor of only 1.6. We analyzed the security of ANTP using a novel provable security framework that involves adversary control of time, and show that ANTP achieves secure time synchronization under standard cryptographic assumptions; our framework may also be used to analyze other candidates for securing NTP.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 15980252-86e0-4bc0-9264-2d4bd0f7930cCited by top-tier papers3
- Preventing (Network) Time Travel with ChronosOmer Deutsch, Neta Rozen Schiff, Danny Dolev, Michael SchapiraNDSS 2018 · 17 citations
- Did the Shark Eat the Watchdog in the NTP Pool? Deceiving the NTP Pool's Monitoring SystemJonghoon Kwon, Jeonggyu Song, Junbeom Hur, Adrian PerrigUSENIX Security 2023
- A Devil of a Time: How Vulnerable is NTP to Malicious Timeservers?Yarin Perry, Neta Rozen Schiff, Michael SchapiraNDSS 2021
Builds on1
Related papers
- On Borrowed Time: Measurement-Informed Understanding of the NTP Pool's Robustness to Monopoly AttacksRobert Beverly, Erik C. RyeNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Precision Time Protocol in Today's Wi-Fi Networks: A Measurement StudyPaizhuo Chen, Zhice YangUSENIX ATC 2021 · 21 citations
- Just How Secure is SRP, Really?Jiayu Xu, Zhiyuan ZhaoCRYPTO 2026
- PTPsec: Securing the Precision Time Protocol Against Time Delay Attacks Using Cyclic Path Asymmetry AnalysisAndreas Finkenzeller, Oliver Butowski, Emanuel Regnath, Mohammad Hamad et al.INFOCOM 2024 · 15 citations
- PASTA: PASsword-based Threshold AuthenticationShashank Agrawal, Peihan Miao, Payman Mohassel, Pratyay MukherjeeCCS 2018 · 84 citations
