Lune

FOCS2024Top-tier venue

Fully Dynamic k-Clustering with Fast Update Time and Small Recourse

Sayan Bhattacharya, Martín Costa, Naveen Garg, Silvio Lattanzi, Nikos Parotsidis

2024Year
1Citations
11Top-tier citations

Abstract

In the dynamic metrick−mediank-\mathbf{median}problem, we wish to maintain a set ofkkcentersS⊆VS\subseteq Vin an input metric space(V,d)(V, d)that gets updated via point insertions/deletions, so as to minimize the objective∑x∈Vmin⁡y∈Sd(x,y)\sum\nolimits_{x\in V}\min\nolimits_{y\in S}d(x, y). The quality of a dynamic algorithm is measured in terms of its approximation ratio, “recourse” (the number of changes inSSper update) and “update time” (the time it takes to handle an update). The ultimate goal in this line of research is to obtain a dynamicO(1)O(1)approximation algorithm withO~(1)\tilde{O}(1)recourse andO~(k)\tilde{O}(k)update time. Dynamick−mediank-\mathbf{median}is a canonical example of a class of problems known as dynamick−clusteringk-\mathbf{clustering}, that has received significant attention in recent years [Fichtenberger et al, SODA'21], [Bateni et al, SODA'23], [Lacki et al, SODA'24]. To the best of our knowledge, however, all these previous papers either attempt to minimize the algorithm's recourse while ignoring its update time, or minimize the algorithm's update time while ignoring its recourse. For dynamick−mediank-\mathbf{median}in particular, the state-of-the-art results getO~(k2)\tilde{O}(k^{2})update time andO(k)O(k)recourse [Cohen-Addad et al, ICML'19], [Henzinger and Kale, ESA'20], [Bhattacharya et al, NeurIPS'23]. But, this recourse bound ofO(k)O(k)can be trivially obtained by recomputing an optimal solution from scratch after every update, provided we ignore the update time. In addition, the update time ofO~(k2)\tilde{O}(k^{2})is polynomially far away from the desired bound ofO~(k)\tilde{O}(k). We come arbitrarily close to resolving the main open question on this topic, with the following results. (I) We develop a new framework of randomized local search that is suitable for adaptation in a dynamic setting. For everyϵ>0\epsilon > 0, this gives us a dynamick−mediank-\mathbf{median}algorithm withO(kϵ)O(k^{\epsilon})approximation ratio,O~(kϵ)\tilde{O}(k^{\epsilon})recourse andO~(k1+ϵ)\tilde{O}(k^{1+\epsilon})update time. This framework also generalizes to dynamick−clusteringk-\mathbf{clustering}withℓp\ell^{p}-norm objectives. As a corollary, we obtain similar bounds for the dynamick−meansk-\mathbf{means}problem, and a new trade-off between approximation ratio, recourse and update time for the dynamick−centerk-\mathbf{center}problem. (II) If it suffices to maintain only an estimate of the value of the optimalk−mediank-\mathbf{median}objective, then we obtain aO(1)O(1)approximation algorithm withO~(k)\tilde{O}(k)update time. We achieve this result via adapting the Lagrangian Relaxation framework of [Jain and Vazirani, JACM'01], and a facility location algorithm of [Mettu and Plaxton, FOCS'00] in the dynamic setting.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 153bf53a-b7a6-4bb1-8d06-1806616694fc

Cited by top-tier papers11

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on4

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines