Learning Complexity of Gradient Descent and Conjugate Gradient Algorithms
Xianqi Jiao, Jia Liu, Zhiping Chen
Abstract
Gradient Descent (GD) and Conjugate Gradient (CG) methods are among the most effective iterative algorithms for solving unconstrained optimization problems, particularly in machine learning and statistical modeling, where they are employed to minimize cost functions. In these algorithms, tunable parameters, such as step sizes or conjugate parameters, play a crucial role in determining key performance metrics, like runtime and solution quality. In this work, we introduce a framework that models algorithm selection as a statistical learning problem, and thus learning complexity can be estimated by the pseudo-dimension of the algorithm group. We first propose a new cost measure for unconstrained optimization algorithms, inspired by the concept of primal-dual integral in mixed-integer linear programming. Based on the new cost measure, we derive an improved upper bound for the pseudo-dimension of gradient descent algorithm group by discretizing the set of step size configurations. Moreover, we generalize our findings from gradient descent algorithm to the conjugate gradient algorithm group for the first time, and prove the existence a learning algorithm capable of probabilistically identifying the optimal algorithm with a sufficiently large sample size.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 150f92a6-b5d5-4220-bb8f-897fd707e749Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Meta-Learning in GamesKeegan Harris, Ioannis Anagnostides, Gabriele Farina, Mikhail Khodak et al.ICLR 2023 · 196 citations
- Learning-to-learn non-convex piecewise-Lipschitz functionsMaria-Florina Balcan, Mikhail Khodak, Dravyansh Sharma, Ameet TalwalkarNeurIPS 2021 · 23 citations
- Guarantees for Tuning the Step Size using a Learning-to-Learn ApproachXiang Wang, Shuai Yuan, Chenwei Wu, Rong GeICML 2021 · 16 citations
- How much data is sufficient to learn high-performing algorithms? generalization guarantees for data-driven algorithm designMaria-Florina Balcan, Dan F. DeBlasio, Travis Dick, Carl Kingsford et al.STOC 2021 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Tuning-Free Stochastic OptimizationAhmed Khaled, Chi JinICML 2024 · 13 citations
- Sample Complexity of Learning Heuristic Functions for Greedy-Best-First and A* SearchShinsaku Sakaue, Taihei OkiNeurIPS 2022 · 8 citations
- What is a Good Metric to Study Generalization of Minimax Learners?Asuman E. Ozdaglar, Sarath Pattathil, Jiawei Zhang, Kaiqing ZhangNeurIPS 2022 · 23 citations
- Learning Configurations for Data-Driven Multi-Objective OptimizationZhiyang Chen, Hailong Yao, Xia YinICML 2025
- Improving Computational Complexity in Statistical Models with Local Curvature InformationPedram Akbarian, Tongzheng Ren, Jiacheng Zhuo, Sujay Sanghavi et al.ICML 2024
