Zero-Shot Learning for Materials Science Texts: Leveraging Duck Typing Principles
Xin Zhang, Peiliang Zhang, Jingling Yuan, Lin Li
Abstract
Materials science text mining (MSTM), involving tasks like property extraction and synthesis action retrieval, is pivotal for advancing research by deriving critical insights from scientific literature. Descriptors, serving as essential task labels, often vary in meaning depending on researchers' usage purposes across different mining tasks. (e.g., 'Material' can refer to both synthesis components and participants in fuel cell experiment). This meaning difference makes it difficult for existing methods, fine-tuned to specific task, to handle the same descriptors in other tasks. To overcome above limitation, we propose MatDuck, a simple and effective approach for Zero-Shot MSTM by evoking material knowledge within Large Language Models (LLMs). Specifically, inspired by the Duck Typing principles in programming languages, we present a ClassDefinition-Style Descriptor generation method that evokes task-specific characteristics to address usage variation. Subsequently, we introduce code-style in-context learning for zero-shot tasks, reframing them into code to leverage LLMs' proficiency in code understanding. Extensive experiments on eight benchmark datasets demonstrate that MatDuck, as a plug-and-play approach, significantly improves the Zero-Shot MSTM performance of LLMs by an average of 11.3% across seven tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 150d3c27-c26d-4230-9f97-84da0d0f90c5Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- ExpeL: LLM Agents Are Experiential LearnersAndrew Zhao, Daniel Huang, Quentin Xu, Matthieu Lin et al.AAAI 2024 · 484 citations
- Plan-and-Solve Prompting: Improving Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought Reasoning by Large Language ModelsLei Wang, Wanyu Xu, Yihuai Lan, Zhiqiang Hu et al.ACL 2023 · 249 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing Activity Prediction Models in Drug Discovery with the Ability to Understand Human LanguagePhilipp Seidl, Andreu Vall, Sepp Hochreiter, Günter KlambauerICML 2023 · 69 citations
- Gen-Z: Generative Zero-Shot Text Classification with Contextualized Label DescriptionsSachin Kumar, Chan Young Park, Yulia TsvetkovICLR 2024 · 8 citations
- CrystalICL: Enabling In-Context Learning for Crystal GenerationRuobing Wang, Qiaoyu Tan, Yili Wang, Ying Wang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 3 citations
- Follow-Up Differential Descriptions: Language Models Resolve Ambiguities for Image ClassificationReza Esfandiarpoor, Stephen H. BachICLR 2024 · 18 citations
- MatSci-NLP: Evaluating Scientific Language Models on Materials Science Language Tasks Using Text-to-Schema ModelingYu Song, Santiago Miret, Bang LiuACL 2023 · 24 citations
