Conservative Offline Distributional Reinforcement Learning
Yecheng Jason Ma, Dinesh Jayaraman, Osbert Bastani
Abstract
Many reinforcement learning (RL) problems in practice are offline, learning purely from observational data. A key challenge is how to ensure the learned policy is safe, which requires quantifying the risk associated with different actions. In the online setting, distributional RL algorithms do so by learning the distribution over returns (i.e., cumulative rewards) instead of the expected return; beyond quantifying risk, they have also been shown to learn better representations for planning. We propose Conservative Offline Distributional Actor Critic (CODAC), an offline RL algorithm suitable for both risk-neutral and risk-averse domains. CODAC adapts distributional RL to the offline setting by penalizing the predicted quantiles of the return for out-of-distribution actions. We prove that CODAC learns a conservative return distribution -- in particular, for finite MDPs, CODAC converges to an uniform lower bound on the quantiles of the return distribution; our proof relies on a novel analysis of the distributional Bellman operator. In our experiments, on two challenging robot navigation tasks, CODAC successfully learns risk-averse policies using offline data collected purely from risk-neutral agents. Furthermore, CODAC is state-of-the-art on the D4RL MuJoCo benchmark in terms of both expected and risk-sensitive performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14c44e58-be80-441f-9891-18e50b59b11fCited by top-tier papers44
- Mildly Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningJiafei Lyu, Xiaoteng Ma, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Versatile Offline Imitation from Observations and Examples via Regularized State-Occupancy MatchingYecheng Jason Ma, Andrew Shen, Dinesh Jayaraman, Osbert BastaniICML 2022 · 49 citations
- Supported Value Regularization for Offline Reinforcement LearningYixiu Mao, Hongchang Zhang, Chen Chen, Yi Xu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 37 citations
- Near-Minimax-Optimal Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning with CVaRKaiwen Wang, Nathan Kallus, Wen SunICML 2023 · 36 citations
- Double Check Your State Before Trusting It: Confidence-Aware Bidirectional Offline Model-Based ImaginationJiafei Lyu, Xiu Li, Zongqing LuNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
Builds on7
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- MOPO: Model-based Offline Policy OptimizationTianhe Yu, Garrett Thomas, Lantao Yu, Stefano Ermon et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 989 citations
- An Optimistic Perspective on Offline Reinforcement LearningRishabh Agarwal, Dale Schuurmans, Mohammad NorouziICML 2020 · 568 citations
- Being Optimistic to Be Conservative: Quickly Learning a CVaR PolicyRamtin Keramati, Christoph Dann, Alex Tamkin, Emma BrunskillAAAI 2020 · 86 citations
- Risk-Averse Offline Reinforcement LearningNúria Armengol Urpí, Sebastian Curi, Andreas KrauseICLR 2021 · 81 citations
Related papers
- Trust Region-Based Safe Distributional Reinforcement Learning for Multiple ConstraintsDohyeong Kim, Kyungjae Lee, Songhwai OhNeurIPS 2023 · 26 citations
- RAMAC: Multimodal Risk-Aware Offline Reinforcement Learning and the Role of Behavior RegularizationKai Fukazawa, Kunal Mundada, Iman SoltaniICML 2026
- Confidence-Conditioned Value Functions for Offline Reinforcement LearningJoey Hong, Aviral Kumar, Sergey LevineICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- A Distributional Approach to Uncertainty-Aware Preference Alignment Using Offline DemonstrationsSheng Xu, Bo Yue, Hongyuan Zha, Guiliang LiuICLR 2025
- Compositional Conservatism: A Transductive Approach in Offline Reinforcement LearningYeda Song, Dongwook Lee, Gunhee KimICLR 2024 · 1 citation
