Geometrically Principled Connections in Graph Neural Networks
Shunwang Gong, Mehdi Bahri, Michael M. Bronstein, Stefanos Zafeiriou
Abstract
Graph convolution operators bring the advantages of deep learning to a variety of graph and mesh processing tasks previously deemed out of reach. With their continued success comes the desire to design more powerful architectures, often by adapting existing deep learning techniques to non-Euclidean data. In this paper, we argue geometry should remain the primary driving force behind innovation in the emerging field of geometric deep learning. We relate graph neural networks to widely successful computer graphics and data approximation models: radial basis functions (RBFs). We conjecture that, like RBFs, graph convolution layers would benefit from the addition of simple functions to the powerful convolution kernels. We introduce affine skip connections, a novel building block formed by combining a fully connected layer with any graph convolution operator. We experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our technique, and show the improved performance is the consequence of more than the increased number of parameters. Operators equipped with the affine skip connection markedly outperform their base performance on every task we evaluated, i.e., shape reconstruction, dense shape correspondence, and graph classification. We hope our simple and effective approach will serve as a solid baseline and help ease future research in graph neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 14bd6001-72ad-4633-9a1c-161dccb2f67eCited by top-tier papers7
- Training Graph Neural Networks with 1000 LayersGuohao Li, Matthias Müller, Bernard Ghanem, Vladlen KoltunICML 2021 · 294 citations
- On Provable Benefits of Depth in Training Graph Convolutional NetworksWeilin Cong, Morteza Ramezani, Mehrdad MahdaviNeurIPS 2021 · 93 citations
- Towards Deepening Graph Neural Networks: A GNTK-based Optimization PerspectiveWei Huang, Yayong Li, Weitao Du, Richard Y. D. Xu et al.ICLR 2022 · 19 citations
- On Graph Neural Networks versus Graph-Augmented MLPsLei Chen, Zhengdao Chen, Joan BrunaICLR 2021 · 9 citations
- Adaptive Spiral Layers for Efficient 3D Representation Learning on MeshesFrancesca Babiloni, Matteo Maggioni, Thomas Tanay, Jiankang Deng et al.ICCV 2023 · 2 citations
Builds on2
- DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go As Deep As CNNs?Guohao Li, Matthias Müller, Ali K. Thabet, Bernard GhanemICCV 2019 · 1,586 citations
- Neural 3D Morphable Models: Spiral Convolutional Networks for 3D Shape Representation Learning and GenerationGiorgos Bouritsas, Sergiy Bokhnyak, Stylianos Ploumpis, Stefanos Zafeiriou et al.ICCV 2019 · 187 citations
Related papers
- Primal-Dual Mesh Convolutional Neural NetworksFrancesco Milano, Antonio Loquercio, Antoni Rosinol, Davide Scaramuzza et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 116 citations
- DualConvMesh-Net: Joint Geodesic and Euclidean Convolutions on 3D MeshesJonas Schult, Francis Engelmann, Theodora Kontogianni, Bastian LeibeCVPR 2020
- CNNs on surfaces using rotation-equivariant featuresRuben Wiersma, Elmar Eisemann, Klaus HildebrandtSIGGRAPH 2020 · 63 citations
- Shape correspondence using anisotropic Chebyshev spectral CNNsQinsong Li, Shengjun Liu, Ling Hu, Xinru LiuCVPR 2020
- Gauge Equivariant Mesh CNNs: Anisotropic convolutions on geometric graphsPim de Haan, Maurice Weiler, Taco Cohen, Max WellingICLR 2021 · 139 citations
