Feasible Reachable Policy Iteration
Shentao Qin, Yujie Yang, Yao Mu, Jie Li, Wenjun Zou, Jingliang Duan, Shengbo Eben Li
Abstract
The goal-reaching tasks with safety constraints are common control problems in real world, such as intelligent driving and robot manipulation. The difficulty of this kind of problem comes from the exploration termination caused by safety constraints and the sparse rewards caused by goals. The existing safe RL avoids unsafe exploration by restricting the search space to a feasible region, the essence of which is the pruning of the search space. However, there are still many ineffective explorations in the feasible region because of the ignorance of the goals. Our approach considers both safety and goals; the policy space pruning is achieved by a function called feasible reachable function, which describes whether there is a policy to make the agent safely reach the goals in the finite time domain. This function naturally satisfies the self-consistent condition and the risky Bellman equation, which can be solved by the fixed point iteration method. On this basis, we propose feasible reachable policy iteration (FRPI), which is divided into three steps: policy evaluation, region expansion, and policy improvement. In the region expansion step, by using the information of agent to reach the goals, the convergence of the feasible region is accelerated, and simultaneously a smaller feasible reachable region is identified. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed FR function in both improving the convergence speed of better or comparable performance without sacrificing safety and identifying a smaller policy space with higher sample efficiency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 144fc5f3-cf4a-4ec4-bfd6-265497edcdafCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Reachability Constrained Reinforcement LearningDongjie Yu, Haitong Ma, Sheng-bo Li, Jianyu ChenICML 2022 · 90 citations
- Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion ModelYinan Zheng, Jianxiong Li, Dongjie Yu, Yujie Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 72 citations
- Learning Barrier Certificates: Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning with Zero Training-time ViolationsYuping Luo, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 58 citations
- Conservative Safety Critics for ExplorationHomanga Bharadhwaj, Aviral Kumar, Nicholas Rhinehart, Sergey Levine et al.ICLR 2021 · 32 citations
Related papers
- SafeMPO: Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Probabilistic Incremental ImprovementAlexander Mattick, Dominik Seuß, Christopher MutschlerICLR 2026
- Solving Parameter-Robust Avoid Problems with Unknown Feasibility using Reinforcement LearningOswin So, Eric Yang Yu, Songyuan Zhang, Matthew Cleaveland et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Iterative Reachability Estimation for Safe Reinforcement LearningMilan Ganai, Zheng Gong, Chenning Yu, Sylvia L. Herbert et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 56 citations
- First Order Constrained Optimization in Policy SpaceYiming Zhang, Quan Vuong, Keith W. RossNeurIPS 2020 · 238 citations
- Safe Reinforcement Learning with Natural Language ConstraintsTsung-Yen Yang, Michael Y. Hu, Yinlam Chow, Peter J. Ramadge et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 37 citations
