A Solvable Attention for Neural Scaling Laws
Bochen Lyu, Di Wang, Zhanxing Zhu
Abstract
Transformers and many other deep learning models are empirically shown to predictably enhance their performance as a power law in training time, model size, or the number of training data points, which is termed as the neural scaling law. This paper studies this intriguing phenomenon particularly for the transformer architecture in theoretical setups. Specifically, we propose a framework for linear self-attention, the underpinning block of transformer without softmax, to learn in an in-context manner, where the corresponding learning dynamics is modeled as a non-linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) system. Furthermore, we establish a procedure to derive a tractable approximate solution for this ODE system by reformulating it as a Riccati equation, which allows us to precisely characterize neural scaling laws for linear self-attention with training time, model size, data size, and the optimal compute. In addition, we reveal that the linear self-attention shares similar neural scaling laws with several other architectures when the context sequence length of the in-context learning is fixed, otherwise it would exhibit a different scaling law of training time.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1389b9d3-fd1c-4008-b7da-b571f5f183acCited by top-tier papers4
- What Scales in Cross-Entropy Scaling Law?Junxi Yan, Zixi Wei, Qingyao Ai, Yiqun Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Transformers with RL or SFT Provably Learn Sparse Boolean Functions, But DifferentlyBochen Lyu, Yiyang Jia, Xiaohao Cai, Zhanxing ZhuICML 2026
- Scaling Laws of SignSGD in Linear Regression: When Does It Outperform SGD?Jihwan Kim, Dogyoon Song, Chulhee YunICLR 2026
- Spectral Scaling Laws in Language Models: emphHow Effectively Do Feed-Forward Networks Use Their Latent Space?Nandan Kumar Jha, Brandon ReagenEMNLP 2025
Builds on25
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- What Can Transformers Learn In-Context? A Case Study of Simple Function ClassesShivam Garg, Dimitris Tsipras, Percy Liang, Gregory ValiantNeurIPS 2022 · 883 citations
- Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient DescentJohannes von Oswald, Eyvind Niklasson, Ettore Randazzo, João Sacramento et al.ICML 2023 · 729 citations
- Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningBen Sorscher, Robert Geirhos, Shashank Shekhar, Surya Ganguli et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 720 citations
- Transformers learn to implement preconditioned gradient descent for in-context learningKwangjun Ahn, Xiang Cheng, Hadi Daneshmand, Suvrit SraNeurIPS 2023 · 324 citations
Related papers
- Theory of Scaling Laws for In-Context Regression: Depth, Width, Context and TimeBlake Bordelon, Mary I. Letey, Cengiz PehlevanICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Sub-Linear Memory: How to Make Performers SLiMValerii Likhosherstov, Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski, Jared Quincy Davis, Xingyou Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 25 citations
- Understanding Scaling Laws with Statistical and Approximation Theory for Transformer Neural Networks on Intrinsically Low-dimensional DataAlexander Havrilla, Wenjing LiaoNeurIPS 2024 · 36 citations
- Transformers Efficiently Perform In-Context Logistic Regression via Normalized Gradient DescentChenyang Zhang, Yuan CaoICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Linear Log-Normal Attention with Unbiased ConcentrationYury Nahshan, Joseph Kampeas, Emir HalevaICLR 2024 · 13 citations
