Robust Model-Based Optimization for Challenging Fitness Landscapes
Saba Ghaffari, Ehsan Saleh, Alexander G. Schwing, Yu-Xiong Wang, Martin D. Burke, Saurabh Sinha
Abstract
Protein design, a grand challenge of the day, involves optimization on a fitness landscape, and leading methods adopt a model-based approach where a model is trained on a training set (protein sequences and fitness) and proposes candidates to explore next. These methods are challenged by sparsity of high-fitness samples in the training set, a problem that has been in the literature. A less recognized but equally important problem stems from the distribution of training samples in the design space: leading methods are not designed for scenarios where the desired optimum is in a region that is not only poorly represented in training data, but also relatively far from the highly represented low-fitness regions. We show that this problem of "separation" in the design space is a significant bottleneck in existing model-based optimization tools and propose a new approach that uses a novel VAE as its search model to overcome the problem. We demonstrate its advantage over prior methods in robustly finding improved samples, regardless of the imbalance and separation between low-and high-fitness training samples. Our comprehensive benchmark on real and semi-synthetic protein datasets as well as solution design for physics-informed neural networks, showcases the generality of our approach in discrete and continuous design spaces. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/sabagh1994/PGVAE .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- ProSpero: Active Learning for Robust Protein Design Beyond Wild-Type NeighborhoodsMichal Kmicikiewicz, Vincent Fortuin, Ewa SzczurekNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Generative property enhancer: implicit guided generation through conditional density estimationPedro O. Pinheiro, Pan Kessel, Aya Abdelsalam Ismail, Sai Pooja Mahajan et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Data Distillation for extrapolative protein design through exact preference optimizationMostafa Karimi, Sharmi Banerjee, Tommi S. Jaakkola, Bella Dubrov et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on9
- Model-based reinforcement learning for biological sequence designChristof Angermüller, David Dohan, David Belanger, Ramya Deshpande et al.ICLR 2020 · 159 citations
- Model Inversion Networks for Model-Based OptimizationAviral Kumar, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 129 citations
- Design-Bench: Benchmarks for Data-Driven Offline Model-Based OptimizationBrandon Trabucco, Xinyang Geng, Aviral Kumar, Sergey LevineICML 2022 · 126 citations
- Autofocused oracles for model-based designClara Fannjiang, Jennifer ListgartenNeurIPS 2020 · 90 citations
- Proximal Exploration for Model-guided Protein Sequence DesignZhizhou Ren, Jiahan Li, Fan Ding, Yuan Zhou et al.ICML 2022 · 52 citations
Related papers
- A Variational Perspective on Generative Protein Fitness OptimizationLea Bogensperger, Dominik Narnhofer, Ahmed Allam, Konrad Schindler et al.ICML 2025
- Generating Novel, Designable, and Diverse Protein Structures by Equivariantly Diffusing Oriented Residue CloudsYeqing Lin, Mohammed AlQuraishiICML 2023 · 105 citations
- Improving protein optimization with smoothed fitness landscapesAndrew Kirjner, Jason Yim, Raman Samusevich, Shahar Bracha et al.ICLR 2024 · 28 citations
- Robust Optimization in Protein Fitness Landscapes Using Reinforcement Learning in Latent SpaceMinji Lee, Luiz Felipe Vecchietti, Hyunkyu Jung, Hyun Joo Ro et al.ICML 2024 · 18 citations
- Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness OptimizationJason Yang, Wenda Chu, Daniel Khalil, Raul Astudillo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
