Modular Reasoning about Global Variables and Their Initialization
João C. Pereira, Isaac van Bakel, Patricia Firlejczyk, Marco Eilers, Peter Müller
Abstract
Many imperative programming languages offer global variables to implement common functionality such as global caches and counters. Global variables are typically initialized by module initializers (e.g., static initializers in Java), code blocks that are executed automatically by the runtime system. When or in what order these initializers run is typically not known statically and modularly. For instance in Java, initialization is triggered dynamically upon the first use of a class, while in Go, the order depends on all packages of a program. As a result, reasoning modularly about global variables and their initialization is difficult, especially because module initializers may perform arbitrary side effects and may have cyclic dependencies. Consequently, existing modular verification techniques either do not support global state or impose drastic restrictions that are not satisfied by mainstream languages and programs.
In this paper, we present the first practical verification technique to reason formally and modularly about global state and its initialization. Our technique is based on separation logic and uses module invariants to specify ownership and values of global variables. A partial order on modules and methods allows us to reason modularly about when a module invariant may be soundly assumed to hold, irrespective of when exactly the module initializer establishing it runs. Our technique supports both thread-local and shared global state. We formalize it as a program logic in Iris and prove its soundness in Rocq. We make only minimal assumptions about the initialization semantics, making our technique applicable to a wide range of programming languages. We implemented our technique in existing verifiers for Java and Go and demonstrate its effectiveness on typical uses cases of global state as well as a substantial codebase implementing an Internet router.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 13267dd3-e445-4f93-ae45-ee5346be83c3Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Actris: session-type based reasoning in separation logicJonas Kastberg Hinrichsen, Jesper Bengtson, Robbert KrebbersPOPL 2020 · 44 citations
- A type-and-effect system for object initializationFengyun Liu, Ondrej Lhoták, Aggelos Biboudis, Paolo G. Giarrusso et al.OOPSLA 2020 · 8 citations
- A conceptual framework for safe object initialization: a principled and mechanized soundness proof of the Celsius modelClement Blaudeau, Fengyun LiuOOPSLA 2022 · 2 citations
- Initializing Global Objects: Time and OrderFengyun Liu, Ondrej Lhoták, David Hua, Enze XingOOPSLA 2023
Related papers
- Program Logics à la CarteMax Vistrup, Michael Sammler, Ralf JungPOPL 2025 · 4 citations
- Leaf: Modularity for Temporary Sharing in Separation LogicTravis Hance, Jon Howell, Oded Padon, Bryan ParnoOOPSLA 2023 · 3 citations
- Raven: An SMT-Based Concurrency VerifierEkanshdeep Gupta, Nisarg Patel, Thomas WiesCAV 2025 · 1 citation
- Beyond Backtracking: Connections in Fine-Grained Concurrent Separation LogicIke Mulder, Lukasz Czajka, Robbert KrebbersPLDI 2023 · 2 citations
- Nola: Later-Free Ghost State for Verifying Termination in IrisYusuke Matsushita, Takeshi TsukadaPLDI 2025 · 2 citations
