R2C: Mapping Room to Chessboard to Unlock LLM As Low-Level Action Planner
Ziyi Bai, Hanxuan Li, Bin Fu, Chuyan Xiong, Ruiping Wang, Xilin Chen
Abstract
This paper explores using large language models (LLMs) as low-level action planners for embodied tasks. While LLMs excel as the robot's "brain" for high-level planning, they face challenges in directly controlling the "body" by generating precise low-level actions. This limitation arises from LLMs' strength in high-level conceptual understanding but their inability to handle spatial perception effectively, restricting their potential in embodied tasks. To address this, we bridge the gap by enabling LLMs to not only comprehend complex instructions but also produce actionable, low-level plans. We introduce Room to Chessboard (R2C), a novel semantic representation that maps environmental states onto a grid-based chessboard, empowering LLMs to generate specific low-level coordinates and guide the robot in a manner akin to playing a game of chess. To further enhance decision-making, we propose the Chain-of-Thought Decision (CoT-D) paradigm, which improves LLMs' interpretability and context-awareness in spatial reasoning. By jointly training LLMs for high-level task decomposition and low-level action generation, we create a unified "brainbody" system capable of handling complex, free-form instructions while producing precise low-level actions, allowing the robot to flexibly control its movements and adapt to varying tasks. We validate R2C using both fine-tuned open-source LLMs and GPT-4, demonstrating effectiveness on the challenging ALFRED benchmark. Results show that with our R2C framework, LLMs can effectively act as low-level planners, generalizing across diverse settings and open-vocabulary robotic tasks. The code and demonstrations are available at: https://vipl-vsu.github. io/Room2Chessboard.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language ModelDanny Driess, Fei Xia, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Corey Lynch et al.ICML 2023 · 2,601 citations
- Language Models as Zero-Shot Planners: Extracting Actionable Knowledge for Embodied AgentsWenlong Huang, Pieter Abbeel, Deepak Pathak, Igor MordatchICML 2022 · 1,539 citations
- Object Goal Navigation using Goal-Oriented Semantic ExplorationDevendra Singh Chaplot, Dhiraj Gandhi, Abhinav Gupta, Ruslan SalakhutdinovNeurIPS 2020 · 857 citations
- LLM-Planner: Few-Shot Grounded Planning for Embodied Agents with Large Language ModelsChan Hee Song, Brian M. Sadler, Jiaman Wu, Wei-Lun Chao et al.ICCV 2023 · 685 citations
Related papers
- Instruction-Augmented Long-Horizon Planning: Embedding Grounding Mechanisms in Embodied Mobile ManipulationFangyuan Wang, Shipeng Lyu, Peng Zhou, Anqing Duan et al.AAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- EmbodiedGPT: Vision-Language Pre-Training via Embodied Chain of ThoughtYao Mu, Qinglong Zhang, Mengkang Hu, Wenhai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 453 citations
- AffordBot: 3D Fine-grained Embodied Reasoning via Multimodal Large Language ModelsXinyi Wang, Xun Yang, Yanlong Xu, Yuchen Wu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 18 citations
- March in Chat: Interactive Prompting for Remote Embodied Referring ExpressionYanyuan Qiao, Yuankai Qi, Zheng Yu, Jing Liu et al.ICCV 2023 · 52 citations
- Multi-Modal Grounded Planning and Efficient Replanning for Learning Embodied Agents with a Few ExamplesTaewoong Kim, Byeonghwi Kim, Jonghyun ChoiAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
