Merge, Then Compress: Demystify Efficient SMoE with Hints from Its Routing Policy
Pingzhi Li, Zhenyu Zhang, Prateek Yadav, Yi-Lin Sung, Yu Cheng, Mohit Bansal, Tianlong Chen
Abstract
Sparsely activated Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) has shown promise to scale up the learning capacity of neural networks, however, they have issues like: (a) High Memory Usage, due to duplication of the network layers into multiple copies as experts; and (b) Redundancy in Experts, as common learning-based routing policies suffer from representational collapse. Therefore, vanilla SMoE models are memory inefficient and non-scalable, especially for resource-constrained downstream scenarios. In this paper, we ask: Can we craft a compact SMoE model by consolidating expert information? What is the best recipe to merge multiple experts into fewer but more knowledgeable experts? Our pilot investigation reveals that conventional model merging methods fail to be effective in such expert merging for SMoE. The potential reasons are: (1) redundant information overshadows critical experts; (2) appropriate neuron permutation for each expert is missing to bring all of them in alignment. To address these challenges, we propose a novel merging algorithm for SMoE, i.e., M-SMoE, which leverages routing statistics to guide expert merging. Specifically, it starts with neuron permutation alignment for experts; then, dominant experts and their "group members" are formed based on routing policies; lastly, every expert group is merged into a single expert by utilizing each expert's activation frequency as their weight for merging, thus diminishing the impact of insignificant experts. Moreover, we draw an interesting observation that our proposed merging promotes a low dimensionality in the merged expert's weight space, naturally paving the way for additional compression. Hence, our final method, MC-SMoE (i.e., Merge, then Compress SMoE), further decomposes the merged experts into low-rank and structural sparse alternatives. Extensive experiments across 8 benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our proposals. For instance, our MC-SMoE achieves up to 80% memory and a 20% FLOPs reduction, with virtually no loss in performance. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 12cf7c98-1a10-4560-917d-171b0c8a7bf6Cited by top-tier papers36
- TIES-Merging: Resolving Interference When Merging ModelsPrateek Yadav, Derek Tam, Leshem Choshen, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 999 citations
- Domain-Specific Pruning of Large Mixture-of-Experts Models with Few-shot DemonstrationsZican Dong, Han Peng, Peiyu Liu, Xin Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 24 citations
- MoESD: Unveil Speculative Decoding's Potential for Accelerating Sparse MoEZongle Huang, Lei Zhu, Zongyuan Zhan, Ting Hu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 23 citations
- Unveiling Super Experts in Mixture-of-Experts Large Language ModelsZunhai Su, Qingyuan Li, HaoZhang, Weihao Ye et al.ICLR 2026 · 16 citations
- MixNet: A Runtime Reconfigurable Optical-Electrical Fabric for Distributed Mixture-of-Experts TrainingXudong Liao, Yijun Sun, Han Tian, Xinchen Wan et al.SIGCOMM 2025 · 14 citations
Builds on29
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted WindowsZe Liu, Yutong Lin, Yue Cao, Han Hu et al.ICCV 2021 · 31,683 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- REAP the Experts: Why Pruning Prevails for One-Shot MoE compressionMike Lasby, Ivan Lazarevich, Nish Sinnadurai, Sean Lie et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
- GMoE: Global Mixture of Experts with Logit PropagationGeonwoo Hong, Taehwan KimACL 2026
- Sparse MoE as the New Dropout: Scaling Dense and Self-Slimmable TransformersTianlong Chen, Zhenyu Zhang, Ajay Kumar Jaiswal, Shiwei Liu et al.ICLR 2023 · 6 citations
- Retraining-free Merging of Sparse MoE via Hierarchical ClusteringI-Chun Chen, Hsu-Shen Liu, Wei-Fang Sun, Chen-Hao Chao et al.ICML 2025
- Eigenvectors of Experts are Training-free Non-collapsing RoutersGiang Do, Hung Le, Truyen TranICML 2026 · 1 citation
