Improved Alternating-Moduli PRFs and Post-quantum Signatures
Navid Alamati, Guru-Vamsi Policharla, Srinivasan Raghuraman, Peter Rindal
2024Year
16Citations
10Top-tier citations
Abstract
We revisit the alternating-moduli paradigm for constructing symmetric-key primitives with a focus on constructing efficient protocols to evaluate them using secure multi-party computation (MPC). The alternating-moduli paradigm of Boneh, Ishai, Passelègue, Sahai, and Wu (TCC 2018) enables the construction of various symmetric-key primitives with the common characteristic that the inputs are multiplied by two linear maps over different moduli.
The first contribution focuses on efficient two-party evaluation of alternating-moduli pseudorandom functions (PRFs), effectively building an oblivious PRF. We present a generalized alternating-moduli PRF construction along with methods to lower the communication and computation. We then provide several variants of our protocols with different computation and communication tradeoffs for evaluating the PRF. Most of our protocols are in the hybrid model while one is based on specialized garbling. Our most efficient protocol effectively is about $3\times$ faster and requires $1.3\times$ less communication.
Our next contribution is the efficient evaluation of the one-way function (OWF) $f(x)=\mathbf{B}\cdot_3 (\mathbf{A} \cdot_2 x)$ proposed by Dinur, Goldfeder, Halevi, Ishai, Kelkar, Sharma, and Zaverucha (CRYPTO 21) where $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{F}^{m\times n}_2, \mathbf{B}\in\mathbb{F}^{t\times m}_3$, and $\cdot_p$ is multiplication mod $p$. This surprisingly simple OWF can be evaluated within MPC by secret sharing $[\![x]\!]$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$, locally computing $[\![v]\!]=\mathbf{A}\cdot_2 [\![x]\!]$, performing a modulus switching protocol to $\mathbb{F}_3$ shares, followed by locally computing the output shares $[\![y]\!]=\mathbf{B}\cdot_3 [\![v]\!]$.
We design a bespoke MPC-in-the-Head (MPCitH) signature scheme that evaluates the aforementioned OWF, achieving state-of-the-art performance. The resulting signature has a size ranging from $4.0$ to $5.5$ KB, achieving between $2\text{-}3\times$ reduction compared to the prior work. To the best of our knowledge, this is only $\approx 5\%$ larger than the smallest signature based on symmetric-key primitives, including the latest NIST post-quantum cryptography competition submissions. We also show that our core techniques can be extended to build very small post-quantum ring signatures for rings of small to medium size, which are competitive with state-of-the-art lattice-based schemes. Our techniques are in fact more generally applicable to set membership in MPCitH.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 12bc8d3c-6ca6-4961-8002-6d18b0f6c47cCited by top-tier papers10
- Leap: A Fast, Lattice-Based OPRF with Application to Private Set IntersectionLena Heimberger, Daniel Kales, Riccardo Lolato, Omid Mir et al.EUROCRYPT 2025 · 9 citations
- ORQ: Complex Analytics on Private Data with Strong Security GuaranteesEli Baum, Sam Buxbaum, Nitin Mathai, Muhammad Faisal et al.SOSP 2025 · 4 citations
- Efficient Fuzzy Private Set Intersection from Secret-Shared OPRFXinpeng Yang, Meng Hao, Chenkai Weng, Robert H. Deng et al.S&P 2026 · 2 citations
- Secure Join Operations in Multi-Identifier Databases: Performance and PracticalityWen-Jie Lu, Yongchuan Niu, Yongjun Zhao, Wei Dai et al.VLDB 2026
- Pool: A Practical OT-based OPRF from Learning with RoundingAlex Davidson, Amit Deo, Louis Tremblay ThibaultCCS 2025
Related papers
- MPC-Friendly Symmetric Cryptography from Alternating Moduli: Candidates, Protocols, and ApplicationsItai Dinur, Steven Goldfeder, Tzipora Halevi, Yuval Ishai et al.CRYPTO 2021 · 37 citations
- Shorter Signatures Based on Tailor-Made Minimalist Symmetric-Key CryptoChristoph Dobraunig, Daniel Kales, Christian Rechberger, Markus Schofnegger et al.CCS 2022 · 36 citations
- Limbo: Efficient Zero-knowledge MPCitH-based ArgumentsCyprien Delpech de Saint Guilhem, Emmanuela Orsini, Titouan TanguyCCS 2021 · 4 citations
- Improved Non-Interactive Zero Knowledge with Applications to Post-Quantum SignaturesJonathan Katz, Vladimir Kolesnikov, Xiao WangCCS 2018 · 257 citations
- AIM: Symmetric Primitive for Shorter Signatures with Stronger SecuritySeongkwang Kim, Jincheol Ha, Mincheol Son, ByeongHak Lee et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
