Strategies, Benefits and Challenges of App Store-inspired Requirements Elicitation
Alessio Ferrari, Paola Spoletini
Abstract
App store-inspired elicitation is the practice of exploring competitors' apps, to get inspiration for requirements. This activity is common among developers, but little insight is available on its practical use, advantages and possible issues. This paper aims to empirically analyse this technique in a realistic scenario, in which it is used to extend the requirements of a product that were initially captured by means of more traditional requirements elicitation interviews. Considering this scenario, we conduct an experimental simulation with 58 analysts and collect qualitative data. We perform thematic analysis of the data to identify strategies, benefits, and challenges of app store-inspired elicitation, as well as differences with respect to interviews in the considered elicitation setting. Our results show that: (1) specific guidelines and procedures are required to better conduct app store-inspired elicitation; (2) current search features made available by app stores are not suitable for this practice, and more tool support is required to help analysts in the retrieval and evaluation of competing products; (3) while interviews focus on the why dimension of requirements engineering (i.e., goals), app store-inspired elicitation focuses on how (i.e., solutions), offering indications for implementation and improved usability. Our study provides a framework for researchers to address existing challenges and suggests possible benefits to fostering app store-inspired elicitation among practitioners. • Select at least 5 mobile apps from Google Play or the Apple App Store that are in some way related to the developed product (e.g., other apps for summer camps, apps for trekking, or anything that they consider related).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on1
Related papers
- How Can We Design Privacy-Friendly Apps for Children? Using a Research through Design Process to Understand Developers' Needs and ChallengesAnirudh Ekambaranathan, Jun Zhao, Max Van KleekCSCW 2023 · 18 citations
- Mining Cross-Domain Apps for Software Evolution: A Feature-based ApproachMd Kafil Uddin, Qiang He, Jun Han, Caslon ChuaASE 2021 · 2 citations
- Enabling Data-Driven API Design with Community Usage Data: A Need-Finding StudyTianyi Zhang, Björn Hartmann, Miryung Kim, Elena L. GlassmanCHI 2020 · 25 citations
- User Perspectives and Ethical Experiences of Apps for Depression: A Qualitative Analysis of User ReviewsDionne Bowie-DaBreo, Corina Sas, Heather Iles-Smith, Sandra Sünram-LeaCHI 2022 · 36 citations
- GANSpiration: Balancing Targeted and Serendipitous Inspiration in User Interface Design with Style-Based Generative Adversarial NetworkMohammad Amin Mozaffari, Xinyuan Zhang, Jinghui Cheng, Jin L. C. GuoCHI 2022 · 32 citations
