Federated Learning under Periodic Client Participation and Heterogeneous Data: A New Communication-Efficient Algorithm and Analysis
Michael Crawshaw, Mingrui Liu
Abstract
In federated learning, it is common to assume that clients are always available to participate in training, which may not be feasible with user devices in practice. Recent works analyze federated learning under more realistic participation patterns, such as cyclic client availability or arbitrary participation. However, all such works either require strong assumptions (e.g., all clients participate almost surely within a bounded window), do not achieve linear speedup and reduced communication rounds, or are not applicable in the general non-convex setting. In this work, we focus on nonconvex optimization and consider participation patterns in which the chance of participation over a fixed window of rounds is equal among all clients, which includes cyclic client availability as a special case. Under this setting, we propose a new algorithm, named Amplified SCAFFOLD, and prove that it achieves linear speedup, reduced communication, and resilience to data heterogeneity simultaneously. In particular, for cyclic participation, our algorithm is proved to enjoy communication rounds to find an -stationary point in the non-convex stochastic setting. In contrast, the prior work under the same setting requires communication rounds, where denotes the data heterogeneity. Therefore, our algorithm significantly reduces communication rounds due to better dependency in terms of and . Our analysis relies on a fine-grained treatment of the nested dependence between client participation and errors in the control variates, which results in tighter guarantees than previous work. We also provide experimental results with (1) synthetic data and (2) real-world data with a large number of clients , demonstrating the effectiveness of our algorithm under periodic client participation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11f096ed-ddcf-4629-a120-cb61118fb3fcCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID DataXiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,930 citations
- Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated LearningHaibo Yang, Minghong Fang, Jia LiuICLR 2021 · 310 citations
- Is Local SGD Better than Minibatch SGD?Blake E. Woodworth, Kumar Kshitij Patel, Sebastian U. Stich, Zhen Dai et al.ICML 2020 · 277 citations
- Clustered Sampling: Low-Variance and Improved Representativity for Clients Selection in Federated LearningYann Fraboni, Richard Vidal, Laetitia Kameni, Marco LorenziICML 2021 · 249 citations
Related papers
- Scaffold with Stochastic Gradients: New Analysis with Linear Speed-UpPaul Mangold, Alain Oliviero Durmus, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Eric MoulinesICML 2025
- Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client ParticipationFeijie Wu, Song Guo, Zhihao Qu, Shiqi He et al.ICML 2023 · 27 citations
- On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client ParticipationYae Jee Cho, Pranay Sharma, Gauri Joshi, Zheng Xu et al.ICML 2023 · 47 citations
- A Unified Analysis of Federated Learning with Arbitrary Client ParticipationShiqiang Wang, Mingyue JiNeurIPS 2022 · 85 citations
- Momentum Benefits Non-iid Federated Learning Simply and ProvablyZiheng Cheng, Xinmeng Huang, Pengfei Wu, Kun YuanICLR 2024 · 40 citations
