OmniBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark Integrating Real-World, Time-sensitive, and Multi-Hop Questions with a Multi-Dimensional Hybrid Evaluation Framework
Wenjie Wang, Yufeng Jiang, Ge Sun, Chenghang Dong, Zheng Jun, Mengjie Li, Lixin Chen, Huan Wang, Haoyu Wang, Bin Chen
Abstract
Recently, with the increasing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), AI applications have gradually emerged to solve various problems in people's daily lives, so accurately measuring their performance and reliability is paramount. However, existing benchmarks predominantly rely on closed-ended, multiple-choice or short-answer question formats. While useful for assessment, these formats exhibit a significant gap compared to the diverse and open-ended nature of questions posed by real-world users. To bridge this gap, we produce OmniBench, a comprehensive open-domain benchmark. OmniBench is uniquely composed of authentic, user-generated questions harvested from real-world interactions on various websites and applications, covering 16 rigorously defined knowledge domains and 5 crucial user intents derived from a large-scale analysis of the mass corpus. Crucially, we propose three automated data construction pipelines that enable the continuous and periodic updating of the benchmark dataset. This approach not only ensures that the questions can keep up with current events, but also effectively mitigates the critical issue of data contamination prevalent in static benchmarks. Moreover, a multi-dimensional hybrid evaluation framework named OmniEval is proposed for evaluating the responses. This framework combines diverse metrics and evaluation methods to capture nuanced aspects of answer performance. Extensive validation demonstrates that this evaluation framework exhibits strong alignment with human judgments, ensuring the reliability of the benchmark results.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11def6e4-6dbf-42f5-bacd-6381e8a9a5ceBuilds on3
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- AlignBench: Benchmarking Chinese Alignment of Large Language ModelsXiao Liu, Xuanyu Lei, Shengyuan Wang, Yue Huang et al.ACL 2024 · 9 citations
- WildBench: Benchmarking LLMs with Challenging Tasks from Real Users in the WildBill Yuchen Lin, Yuntian Deng, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Abhilasha Ravichander et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- What Limits Virtual Agent Application? OmniBench: A Scalable Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Essential Virtual Agent CapabilitiesWendong Bu, Yang Wu, Qifan Yu, Minghe Gao et al.ICML 2025
- ValueBench: Towards Comprehensively Evaluating Value Orientations and Understanding of Large Language ModelsYuanyi Ren, Haoran Ye, Hanjun Fang, Xin Zhang et al.ACL 2024
- LiveNewsBench: Evaluating Web Search Agents with Freshly Curated NewsYunfan Zhang, Kathleen McKeown, Smaranda MuresanICML 2026 · 2 citations
- A User-Centric Multi-Intent Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language ModelsJiayin Wang, Fengran Mo, Weizhi Ma, Peijie Sun et al.EMNLP 2024 · 10 citations
- AIR-Bench: Automated Heterogeneous Information Retrieval BenchmarkJianlyu Chen, Nan Wang, Chaofan Li, Bo Wang et al.ACL 2025
