Normality Calibration in Semi-supervised Graph Anomaly Detection
Guolei Zeng, Hezhe Qiao, Guoguo Ai, Jinsong Guo, Guansong Pang
Abstract
Semi-supervised graph anomaly detection (GAD), which assumes a subset of labeled normal nodes for training, is widely studied. However, existing methods learn normality only from these labeled nodes, often overfitting their patterns and causing high detection errors, such as many false positives. To overcome this limitation, we propose , a graph normality calibration framework that leverages both labeled and unlabeled data to calibrate the normality from a teacher (a pre-trained semi-supervised GAD model) jointly in anomaly score and representation spaces. GraphNC includes two main components, anomaly score distribution alignment () and perturbation-based normality regularization (). ScoreDA optimizes our model’s anomaly scores by aligning them with the teacher’s score distribution. Because the teacher provides accurate scores for most normal nodes and some anomalies, this alignment pulls the scores of the two classes toward opposite ends, making them more separable. To reduce the impact of inaccurate teacher scores, NormReg regularizes normality in the representation space, making normal node representations more compact via a perturbation-guided consistency loss applied only to the labeled nodes. Comprehensive experiments on six benchmarks demonstrate that GraphNC (1) consistently and substantially enhances the performance of teacher models from different GAD methods (2) achieves new state-of-the-art performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/mala-lab/GraphNC.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11d1c752-82c3-41f1-92a0-2f3fcb4ff6cbBuilds on18
- Deep Semi-Supervised Anomaly DetectionLukas Ruff, Robert A. Vandermeulen, Nico Görnitz, Alexander Binder et al.ICLR 2020 · 678 citations
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- Rethinking Graph Neural Networks for Anomaly DetectionJianheng Tang, Jiajin Li, Ziqi Gao, Jia LiICML 2022 · 365 citations
- Addressing Heterophily in Graph Anomaly Detection: A Perspective of Graph SpectrumYuan Gao, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Zhenguang Liu et al.WWW 2023 · 189 citations
- Graph Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Contrastive Learning Networks with Augmented ViewJingcan Duan, Siwei Wang, Pei Zhang, En Zhu et al.AAAI 2023 · 159 citations
Related papers
- Generative Semi-supervised Graph Anomaly DetectionHezhe Qiao, Qingsong Wen, Xiaoli Li, Ee-Peng Lim et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 48 citations
- Generalist Graph Anomaly Detection via Prototype-Based DistillationYiming Xu, Zihan Chen, Zhen Peng, Song Wang et al.ICML 2026
- Correcting False Alarms from Unseen: Adapting Graph Anomaly Detectors at Test TimeJunjun Pan, Yixin Liu, Chuan Zhou, Fei Xiong et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- Open-Set Graph Anomaly Detection via Normal Structure RegularisationQizhou Wang, Guansong Pang, Mahsa Salehi, Xiaokun Xia et al.ICLR 2025
- Normality Learning-based Graph Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Contrastive LearningJingcan Duan, Pei Zhang, Siwei Wang, Jingtao Hu et al.ACM MM 2023 · 24 citations
