A Benchmark for Deep Information Synthesis
Debjit Paul, Daniel Murphy, Milan Gritta, Ronald Cardenas, Victor Prokhorov, Lena Sophia Bolliger, Aysim Toker, Roy Vaughan Miles, Andreea-Maria Oncescu, Jasivan Alex Sivakumar, Philipp Borchert, Ismail Elezi
Abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based agents are increasingly used to solve complex tasks involving tool use, such as web browsing, code execution, and data analysis. However, current evaluation benchmarks do not adequately assess their ability to solve real-world tasks that require synthesizing information from multiple sources and inferring insights beyond simple fact retrieval. To address this, we introduce DEEPSYNTH, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate agents on realistic, time-consuming problems that combine information gathering, synthesis, and structured reasoning to produce insights. DEEPSYNTH contains 120 tasks collected across 7 domains and data sources covering 67 countries. DEEPSYNTH is constructed using a multi-stage data collection pipeline that requires annotators to collect official data sources, create hypotheses, perform manual analysis, and design tasks with verifiable answers. When evaluated on DEEPSYNTH, 11 state-of-the-art LLMs and deep research agents achieve a maximum F1 score of 8.97 and 17.5 on the LLM-judge metric, underscoring the difficulty of the benchmark. Our analysis reveals that current agents struggle with hallucinations and reasoning over large information spaces, highlighting DEEPSYNTH as a crucial benchmark for guiding future research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 11c07ef8-12c1-492f-9c8d-018041131ca0Builds on8
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-world Github Issues?Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao et al.ICLR 2024 · 2,082 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM AgentsXingyao Wang, Yangyi Chen, Lifan Yuan, Yizhe Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 436 citations
- OWL: Optimized Workforce Learning for General Multi-Agent Assistance in Real-World Task AutomationMengkang Hu, Yuhang Zhou, Wendong Fan, Yuzhou Nie et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 158 citations
- MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning EngineeringJun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung et al.ICLR 2025 · 9 citations
Related papers
- DeepResearch Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Deep Research AgentsMingxuan Du, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Licheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 250 citations
- WebDS: An End-to-End Benchmark for Web-based Data ScienceEthan Hsu, Hong Meng Yam, Ines Bouissou, Aaron Murali John et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- DeepPlanning: Benchmarking Long-Horizon Agentic Planning with Verifiable ConstraintsYinger Zhang, Shutong Jiang, Renhao Li, Jianhong Tu et al.ACL 2026 · 21 citations
- ResearchRubrics: A Benchmark of Prompts and Rubrics For Evaluating Deep Research AgentsManasi Sharma, Chen Bo Calvin Zhang, Chaithanya Bandi, Clinton Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 83 citations
- FutureX: An Advanced Live Benchmark for LLM Agents in Future PredictionZhiyuan Zeng, Jiashuo Liu, Siyuan Chen, Tianci He et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
