Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity
Xinran Zhao, Hanie Sedghi, Bernd Bohnet, Dale Schuurmans, Azade Nova
Abstract
Planning is essential for artificial intelligence systems to look ahead and proactively determine a course of actions to reach objectives in the virtual and real world. Recent work on large language models (LLMs) sheds light on their planning capability in various tasks. However, it remains unclear what signals in the context influence the model performance. In this work, we explore how to improve the model planning capability through in-context learning (ICL), specifically, what signals can help select the exemplars. Through extensive experiments, we observe that commonly used problem similarity may result in false positives with drastically different plans, which can mislead the model. In response, we propose to sample and filter exemplars leveraging plan side action sequence similarity (AS). We propose GRASE-DC: a two-stage pipeline that first re-samples high AS exemplars and then curates the selected exemplars with dynamic clustering on AS to achieve a balance of relevance and diversity. Our experimental result confirms that GRASE-DC achieves significant performance improvement on various planning tasks (up to 11-40 point absolute accuracy improvement with 27.3% fewer exemplars needed on average). With GRASE-DC * +VAL, where we iteratively apply GRASE-DC with a validator, we are able to even boost the performance by 18.9% more. Extensive analysis validates the consistent performance improvement of GRASE-DC with various backbone LLMs and on both classical planning and natural language planning benchmarks. GRASE-DC can further boost the planning accuracy by 24 absolute points on harder problems using simpler problems as exemplars over a random baseline. This demonstrates its ability to generalize to out-of-distribution problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-FeedbackAman Madaan, Niket Tandon, Prakhar Gupta, Skyler Hallinan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 4,972 citations
- Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language ModelsMaciej Besta, Nils Blach, Ales Kubicek, Robert Gerstenberger et al.AAAI 2024 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Classical Planning with LLM-Generated Heuristics: Challenging the State of the Art with Python CodeAugusto B. Corrêa, André Grahl Pereira, Jendrik SeippNeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Prompt Optimization with EASE? Efficient Ordering-aware Automated Selection of ExemplarsZhaoxuan Wu, Xiaoqiang Lin, Zhongxiang Dai, Wenyang Hu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 44 citations
- DQ-LoRe: Dual Queries with Low Rank Approximation Re-ranking for In-Context LearningJing Xiong, Zixuan Li, Chuanyang Zheng, Zhijiang Guo et al.ICLR 2024
- Understanding In-Context Learning via Supportive Pretraining DataXiaochuang Han, Daniel Simig, Todor Mihaylov, Yulia Tsvetkov et al.ACL 2023 · 16 citations
- Unraveling the Mechanics of Learning-Based Demonstration Selection for In-Context LearningHui Liu, Wenya Wang, Hao Sun, Chris Xing Tian et al.ACL 2025 · 13 citations
