Confidential-PROFITT: Confidential PROof of FaIr Training of Trees
Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Sierra Calanda Wyllie, Nicholas Franzese, Natalie Dullerud, Sébastien Gambs, Nicolas Papernot, Xiao Wang, Adrian Weller
Abstract
Post hoc auditing of model fairness suffers from potential drawbacks: (1) auditing may be highly sensitive to the test samples chosen; (2) the model and/or its training data may need to be shared with an auditor thereby breaking confidentiality. We address these issues by instead providing a certificate that demonstrates that the learning algorithm itself is fair, and hence, as a consequence, so too is the trained model. We introduce a method to provide a confidential proof of fairness for training, in the context of widely used decision trees, which we term Confidential-PROFITT. We propose novel fair decision tree learning algorithms along with customized zero-knowledge proof protocols to obtain a proof of fairness that can be audited by a third party. Using zero-knowledge proofs enables us to guarantee confidentiality of both the model and its training data. We show empirically that bounding the information gain of each node with respect to the sensitive attributes reduces the unfairness of the final tree. In extensive experiments on the COMPAS, Communities and Crime, Default Credit, and Adult datasets, we demonstrate that a company can use Confidential-PROFITT to certify the fairness of their decision tree to an auditor in less than 2 minutes, thus indicating the applicability of our approach. This is true for both the demographic parity and equalized odds definitions of fairness. Finally, we extend Confidential-PROFITT to apply to ensembles of trees.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 1190aecb-e163-473a-ac0a-c8e394a1a4e6Cited by top-tier papers14
- ZKML: An Optimizing System for ML Inference in Zero-Knowledge ProofsBing-Jyue Chen, Suppakit Waiwitlikhit, Ion Stoica, Daniel KangEuroSys 2024 · 65 citations
- Scalable Zero-knowledge Proofs for Non-linear Functions in Machine LearningMeng Hao, Hanxiao Chen, Hongwei Li, Chenkai Weng et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 29 citations
- Confidential-DPproof: Confidential Proof of Differentially Private TrainingAli Shahin Shamsabadi, Gefei Tan, Tudor Cebere, Aurélien Bellet et al.ICLR 2024 · 24 citations
- FARE: Provably Fair Representation Learning with Practical CertificatesNikola Jovanovic, Mislav Balunovic, Dimitar Iliev Dimitrov, Martin T. VechevICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Trustless Audits without Revealing Data or ModelsSuppakit Waiwitlikhit, Ion Stoica, Yi Sun, Tatsunori Hashimoto et al.ICML 2024 · 20 citations
Related papers
- FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural NetworksChhavi Yadav, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Dan Boneh, Kamalika ChaudhuriICML 2024 · 20 citations
- Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online FairnessOlive Franzese, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Carter Luck, Hamed HaddadiNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- FairZK: A Scalable System to Prove Machine Learning Fairness in Zero-KnowledgeTianyu Zhang, Shen Dong, Oyku Deniz Kose, Yanning Shen et al.S&P 2025
- Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model CertificationCarter Luck, Olive Franzese-McLaughlin, Elisaweta Masserova, Akira Takahashi et al.USENIX Security 2026
- A Causal Look at Statistical Definitions of DiscriminationElias Chaibub NetoKDD 2020 · 3 citations
