Low Precision Local Training is Enough for Federated Learning
Zhiwei Li, Yiqiu LI, Binbin Lin, Zhongming Jin, Weizhong Zhang
Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is a prevalent machine learning paradigm designed to address challenges posed by heterogeneous client data while preserving data privacy. Unlike distributed training, it typically orchestrates resource-constrained edge devices to communicate via a low-bandwidth communication network with a central server. This urges the development of more computation and communication efficient training algorithms. In this paper, we propose an efficient FL paradigm, where the local models in the clients are trained with low-precision operations and communicated with the server in low precision format, while only the model aggregation in the server is performed with high-precision computation. We surprisingly find that high precision models can be recovered from the low precision local models with proper aggregation in the server. In this way, both the workload in the client-side and the communication cost can be significantly reduced. We theoretically show that our proposed paradigm can converge to the optimal solution as the training goes on, which demonstrates that low precision local training is enough for FL. Our paradigm can be integrated with existing FL algorithms flexibly. Experiments across extensive benchmarks are conducted to showcase the effectiveness of our proposed method. Notably, the models trained by our method with the precision as low as 8 bits are comparable to those from the full precision training. As a by-product, we show that low precision local training can relieve the over-fitting issue in local training, which under heterogeneous client data can cause the client models drift further away from each other and lead to the failure in model aggregation. Code is released at https://github.com/digbangbang/LPT-FL .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- SCAFFOLD: Stochastic Controlled Averaging for Federated LearningSai Praneeth Karimireddy, Satyen Kale, Mehryar Mohri, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICML 2020 · 3,875 citations
- On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID DataXiang Li, Kaixuan Huang, Wenhao Yang, Shusen Wang et al.ICLR 2020 · 2,930 citations
- Tackling the Objective Inconsistency Problem in Heterogeneous Federated OptimizationJianyu Wang, Qinghua Liu, Hao Liang, Gauri Joshi et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 2,231 citations
- Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated LearningTao Lin, Lingjing Kong, Sebastian U. Stich, Martin JaggiNeurIPS 2020 · 1,615 citations
- Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated LearningLiam Collins, Hamed Hassani, Aryan Mokhtari, Sanjay ShakkottaiICML 2021 · 1,081 citations
Related papers
- FedLMT: Tackling System Heterogeneity of Federated Learning via Low-Rank Model Training with Theoretical GuaranteesJiahao Liu, Yipeng Zhou, Di Wu, Miao Hu et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Resource-Efficient Federated Learning with Hierarchical Aggregation in Edge ComputingZhiyuan Wang, Hongli Xu, Jianchun Liu, He Huang et al.INFOCOM 2021 · 216 citations
- No One Idles: Efficient Heterogeneous Federated Learning with Parallel Edge and Server ComputationFeilong Zhang, Xianming Liu, Shiyi Lin, Gang Wu et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Towards Energy-efficient Federated Learning via INT8-based Training on Mobile DSPsJinliang Yuan, Shangguang Wang, Hongyu Li, Daliang Xu et al.WWW 2024 · 8 citations
- Resolving the Tug-of-War: A Separation of Communication and Learning in Federated LearningJunyi Li, Heng HuangNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
