A Closer Look at Offline RL Agents
Yuwei Fu, Di Wu, Benoit Boulet
Abstract
Despite recent advances in the field of Offline Reinforcement Learning (RL), less attention has been paid to understanding the behaviors of learned RL agents. As a result, there remain some gaps in our understandings, i.e., why is one offline RL agent more performant than another? In this work, we first introduce a set of experiments to evaluate offline RL agents, focusing on three fundamental aspects: representations, value functions and policies. Counterintuitively, we show that a more performant offline RL agent can learn relatively low-quality representations and inaccurate value functions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the proposed experiment setups can be effectively used to diagnose the bottleneck of offline RL agents. Inspired by the evaluation results, a novel offline RL algorithm is proposed by a simple modification of IQL and achieves SOTA performance. Finally, we investigate when a learned dynamics model is helpful to model-free offline RL agents, and introduce an uncertainty-based sample selection method to mitigate the problem of model noises. Code is available at: https://github.com/fuyw/RIQL .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 112fb2aa-e8d7-444f-9e1d-bc34c877f0c2Cited by top-tier papers8
- Is Value Learning Really the Main Bottleneck in Offline RL?Seohong Park, Kevin Frans, Sergey Levine, Aviral KumarNeurIPS 2024 · 99 citations
- EXPO: Stable Reinforcement Learning with Expressive PoliciesPerry Dong, Qiyang Li, Dorsa Sadigh, Chelsea FinnICLR 2026 · 35 citations
- Goal-Conditioned Predictive Coding for Offline Reinforcement LearningZilai Zeng, Ce Zhang, Shijie Wang, Chen SunNeurIPS 2023 · 17 citations
- Conservative State Value Estimation for Offline Reinforcement LearningLiting Chen, Jie Yan, Zhengdao Shao, Lu Wang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Budgeting Counterfactual for Offline RLYao Liu, Pratik Chaudhari, Rasool FakoorNeurIPS 2023 · 6 citations
Builds on29
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text SupervisionChao Jia, Yinfei Yang, Ye Xia, Yi-Ting Chen et al.ICML 2021 · 5,401 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement LearningScott Fujimoto, Shixiang Shane GuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,292 citations
Related papers
- Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Local MisspecificationKefan Dong, Yannis Flet-Berliac, Allen Nie, Emma BrunskillAAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning with Pessimism-Modulated Dynamics BeliefKaiyang Guo, Yunfeng Shao, Yanhui GengNeurIPS 2022 · 39 citations
- Model-Bellman Inconsistency for Model-based Offline Reinforcement LearningYihao Sun, Jiaji Zhang, Chengxing Jia, Haoxin Lin et al.ICML 2023 · 61 citations
- Reward-Consistent Dynamics Models are Strongly Generalizable for Offline Reinforcement LearningFan-Ming Luo, Tian Xu, Xingchen Cao, Yang YuICLR 2024 · 16 citations
- Pessimistic Bootstrapping for Uncertainty-Driven Offline Reinforcement LearningChenjia Bai, Lingxiao Wang, Zhuoran Yang, Zhi-Hong Deng et al.ICLR 2022 · 173 citations
