Martingale Posterior Neural Processes
Hyungi Lee, Eunggu Yun, Giung Nam, Edwin Fong, Juho Lee
Abstract
A Neural Process (NP) estimates a stochastic process implicitly defined with neural networks given a stream of data, rather than pre-specifying priors already known, such as Gaussian processes. An ideal NP would learn everything from data without any inductive biases, but in practice, we often restrict the class of stochastic processes for the ease of estimation. One such restriction is the use of a finite-dimensional latent variable accounting for the uncertainty in the functions drawn from NPs. Some recent works show that this can be improved with more "data-driven" source of uncertainty such as bootstrapping. In this work, we take a different approach based on the martingale posterior, a recently developed alternative to Bayesian inference. For the martingale posterior, instead of specifying prior-likelihood pairs, a predictive distribution for future data is specified. Under specific conditions on the predictive distribution, it can be shown that the uncertainty in the generated future data actually corresponds to the uncertainty of the implicitly defined Bayesian posteriors. Based on this result, instead of assuming any form of the latent variables, we equip a NP with a predictive distribution implicitly defined with neural networks and use the corresponding martingale posteriors as the source of uncertainty. The resulting model, which we name as Martingale Posterior Neural Process (MPNP), is demonstrated to outperform baselines on various tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 111a7d9c-2e4d-4680-b43c-00934d27bf69Cited by top-tier papers11
- Estimating the Hallucination Rate of Generative AIAndrew Jesson, Nicolas Beltran-Velez, Quentin Chu, Sweta Karlekar et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 46 citations
- Spectral Convolutional Conditional Neural ProcessesPeiman Mohseni, Nick DuffieldNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- TabMGP: Martingale Posterior with TabPFNKenyon Ng, Edwin Fong, David Frazier, Jeremias Knoblauch et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- Variational Uncertainty Decomposition for In-Context LearningI. Shavindra Jayasekera, Jacob Si, Filippo Valdettaro, Wenlong Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving SequencesAlan Nawzad Amin, Nate Gruver, Yilun Kuang, Yucen Lily Li et al.ICLR 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on3
- Convolutional Conditional Neural ProcessesJonathan Gordon, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Andrew Y. K. Foong, James Requeima et al.ICLR 2020 · 200 citations
- Meta-Learning Stationary Stochastic Process Prediction with Convolutional Neural ProcessesAndrew Y. K. Foong, Wessel P. Bruinsma, Jonathan Gordon, Yann Dubois et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 96 citations
- Bootstrapping neural processesJuho Lee, Yoonho Lee, Jungtaek Kim, Eunho Yang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Doubly Stochastic Variational Inference for Neural Processes with Hierarchical Latent VariablesQi Wang, Herke van HoofICML 2020 · 50 citations
- Deep Variational Implicit ProcessesLuis A. Ortega, Simón Rodríguez Santana, Daniel Hernández-LobatoICLR 2023 · 15 citations
- MARS: Meta-learning as Score Matching in the Function SpaceKrunoslav Lehman Pavasovic, Jonas Rothfuss, Andreas KrauseICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Martingale Posterior Neural Networks for Fast Sequential Decision MakingGerardo Duran-Martin, Leandro Sánchez-Betancourt, Álvaro Cartea, Kevin MurphyNeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
- Flow Matching Neural ProcessesHussen Abu Hamad, Dan RosenbaumNeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
