Symbolic determinant identity testing (SDIT) is not a null cone problem; and the symmetries of algebraic varieties
Visu Makam, Avi Wigderson
Abstract
The object of study of this paper is the following multi-determinantal algebraic variety, SINGn, m, which captures the symbolic determinant identity testing (SDIT) problem (a canonical version of the polynomial identity testing (PIT) problem), and plays a central role in algebra, algebraic geometry and computational complexity theory. SINGn, m is the set of all m-tuples of n×n complex matrices which span only singular matrices. In other words, the determinant of any linear combination of the matrices in such a tuple vanishes. The algorithmic complexity of testing membership in SINGn, m is a central question in computational complexity. Having almost a trivial probabilistic algorithm, finding an efficient deterministic algorithm is a holy grail of derandomization, and to top it, will imply super-polynomial circuit lower bounds! A sequence of recent works suggests efficient deterministic “geodesic descent” algorithms for memberships in a general class of algebraic varieties, namely the null cones of (reductive) linear group actions. Can such algorithms be used for the problem above? Our main result is negative: SINGn, m is not the null cone of any such group action! This stands in stark contrast to a non-commutative analog of this variety (for which such algorithms work), and points to an inherent structural difficulty of SINGn, m. In other words, we provide a barrier for the attempts of derandomizing SDIT via these algorithms. To prove this result we identify precisely the group of symmetries of SINGn, m. We find this characterization, and the tools we introduce to prove it, of independent interest. Our characterization significantly generalizes a result of Frobenius for the special case m=1 (namely, computing the symmetries of the determinant). Our proof suggests a general method for determining the symmetries of general algebraic varieties, an algorithmic problem that was hardly studied and we believe is central to algebraic complexity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 10a6e58b-b5ef-43fd-a0f5-a9158f0b04f8Related papers
- Learning Read-Once Determinants and the Principal Minor Assignment ProblemAbhiram Aravind, Abhranil Chatterjee, Sumanta Ghosh, Rohit Gurjar et al.STOC 2026
- Determination Problems for Orbit Closures and Matrix GroupsRida Ait El Manssour, George Kenison, Mahsa Shirmohammadi, Anton Varonka et al.POPL 2026
- Strong Algebras and Radical Sylvester-Gallai ConfigurationsRafael Oliveira, Akash Kumar SenguptaSTOC 2024 · 1 citation
- Black-Box Identity Testing of Noncommutative Rational Formulas in Deterministic Quasipolynomial TimeVikraman Arvind, Abhranil Chatterjee, Partha MukhopadhyaySTOC 2024
- Determinant Maximization via Matroid Intersection AlgorithmsAdam Brown, Aditi Laddha, Madhusudhan Pittu, Mohit Singh et al.FOCS 2022 · 2 citations
