Probabilistic Explanations for Linear Models
Bernardo Subercaseaux, Marcelo Arenas, Kuldeep S. Meel
Abstract
Formal XAI is an emerging field that focuses on providing explanations with mathematical guarantees for the decisions made by machine learning models. A significant amount of work in this area is centered on the computation of ``sufficient reasons''. Given a model M and an input instance x, a sufficient reason for the decision x is a subset S of the features of x such that for any instance z that has the same values as x for every feature in S, it holds that M(x) = M(z). Intuitively, this means that the features in S are sufficient to fully justify the classification of x by M. For sufficient reasons to be useful in practice, they should be as small as possible, and a natural way to reduce the size of sufficient reasons is to consider a probabilistic relaxation; the probability of M(x) = M(z) must be at least some value delta in (0,1], where z is a random instance that coincides with x on the features in S. Computing small delta-sufficient reasons (delta-SRs) is known to be a theoretically hard problem; even over decision trees — traditionally deemed simple and interpretable models — strong inapproximability results make the efficient computation of small delta-SRs unlikely. We propose the notion of (delta, epsilon)-SR, a simple relaxation of delta-SRs, and show that this kind of explanations can be computed efficiently over linear models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 109fa6bd-c316-44b4-b9ae-58c863fe73ecCited by top-tier papers7
- Additive Models Explained: A Computational Complexity ApproachShahaf Bassan, Michal Moshkovitz, Guy KatzNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Provably Explaining Neural Additive ModelsShahaf Bassan, Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Volkan Şahin et al.ICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Unifying Formal Explanations: A Complexity-Theoretic PerspectiveShahaf Bassan, Xuanxiang Huang, Guy KatzICLR 2026 · 3 citations
- Conditional Probabilistic Bipolar Argumentation Framework: Explanations, Complexity and ApproximationGianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Domenico Mandaglio, Francesco Parisi et al.AAAI 2026
- Explaining, Fast and Slow: Abstraction and Refinement of Provable ExplanationsShahaf Bassan, Yizhak Yisrael Elboher, Tobias Ladner, Matthias Althoff et al.ICML 2025
Builds on4
- Model Interpretability through the lens of Computational ComplexityPablo Barceló, Mikaël Monet, Jorge Pérez, Bernardo SubercaseauxNeurIPS 2020 · 135 citations
- Explaining Naive Bayes and Other Linear Classifiers with Polynomial Time and DelayJoão Marques-Silva, Thomas Gerspacher, Martin C. Cooper, Alexey Ignatiev et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 86 citations
- On Computing Probabilistic Explanations for Decision TreesMarcelo Arenas, Pablo Barceló, Miguel A. Romero Orth, Bernardo SubercaseauxNeurIPS 2022 · 57 citations
- Foundations of Symbolic Languages for Model InterpretabilityMarcelo Arenas, Daniel Báez, Pablo Barceló, Jorge Pérez et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Consistent Sufficient Explanations and Minimal Local Rules for explaining the decision of any classifier or regressorSalim I. Amoukou, Nicolas J.-B. BrunelNeurIPS 2022 · 8 citations
- Delivering Inflated ExplanationsYacine Izza, Alexey Ignatiev, Peter J. Stuckey, João Marques-SilvaAAAI 2024 · 17 citations
- Local vs. Global Interpretability: A Computational Complexity PerspectiveShahaf Bassan, Guy Amir, Guy KatzICML 2024 · 28 citations
- Provably efficient, succinct, and precise explanationsGuy Blanc, Jane Lange, Li-Yang TanNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient ReasonsShahaf Bassan, Ron Eliav, Shlomit GurICLR 2025
