EvoTest: Evolutionary Test-Time Learning for Self-Improving Agentic Systems
Yufei He, Juncheng Liu, Yue Liu, Yibo Li, Tri Cao, Zhiyuan Hu, Xinxing Xu, Bryan Hooi
Abstract
A fundamental limitation of current AI agents is their inability to learn complex skills on the fly at test time, often behaving like "clever but clueless interns" in novel environments. This severely limits their practical utility. To systematically measure and drive progress on this challenge, we first introduce the Jericho Test-Time Learning (J-TTL) benchmark. J-TTL is a new evaluation setup where an agent must play the same game for several consecutive episodes, attempting to improve its performance from one episode to the next. On J-TTL, we find that existing adaptation methods like reflection, memory, or reinforcement learning struggle. To address the challenges posed by our benchmark, we present EvoTest 1 , an evolutionary test-time learning framework that improves an agent without any fine-tuning or gradients-by evolving the entire agentic system after every episode. EvoTest has two roles: the Actor Agent, which plays the game, and the Evolver Agent, which analyzes the episode transcript to propose a revised configuration for the next run. This configuration rewrites the prompt, updates memory by logging effective state-action choices, tunes hyperparameters, and learns the tool-use routines. On our J-TTL benchmark, EvoTest consistently increases performance, outperforming not only reflection and memory-only baselines but also more complex online fine-tuning methods. Notably, our method is the only one capable of winning two games (Detective and Library), while all baselines fail to win any.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1091c384-7c8b-4ea5-a72b-cd1124aa4a0aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Large Language Models as OptimizersChengrun Yang, Xuezhi Wang, Yifeng Lu, Hanxiao Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 817 citations
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement via Prompt EvolutionChrisantha Fernando, Dylan Banarse, Henryk Michalewski, Simon Osindero et al.ICML 2024 · 432 citations
- MemoryBank: Enhancing Large Language Models with Long-Term MemoryWanjun Zhong, Lianghong Guo, Qiqi Gao, He Ye et al.AAAI 2024 · 394 citations
Related papers
- Learn Like Humans: Use Meta-cognitive Reflection for Efficient Self-ImprovementXinmeng Hou, Bohao Qu, Wuqi Wang, Peiliang Gong et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- MemEvolve: Meta-Evolution of Agent Memory SystemsGuibin Zhang, Haotian Ren, Chong Zhan, Junhao Wang et al.ICML 2026 · 69 citations
- EscapeBench: Towards Advancing Creative Intelligence of Language Model AgentsCheng Qian, Peixuan Han, Qinyu Luo, Bingxiang He et al.ACL 2025
- CATArena: Evaluating Evolutionary Capabilities of Code Agents via Iterative TournamentsLingyue Fu, Xin Ding, Linyue Pan, Yaoming Zhu et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Timely Machine: Awareness of Time Makes Test-Time Scaling AgenticYichuan Ma, Linyang Li, Yongkang Chen, Peiji Li et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
