Closed-Form Training Dynamics Reveal Learned Features and Linear Structure in Word2Vec-like Models
Dhruva Karkada, James B. Simon, Yasaman Bahri, Michael R. DeWeese
Abstract
Self-supervised word embedding algorithms such as word2vec provide a minimal setting for studying representation learning in language modeling. We examine the quartic Taylor approximation of the word2vec loss around the origin, and we show that both the resulting training dynamics and the final performance on downstream tasks are empirically very similar to those of word2vec. Our main contribution is to analytically solve for both the gradient flow training dynamics and the final word embeddings in terms of only the corpus statistics and training hyperparameters. The solutions reveal that these models learn orthogonal linear subspaces one at a time, each one incrementing the effective rank of the embeddings until model capacity is saturated. Training on Wikipedia, we find that each of the top linear subspaces represents an interpretable topic-level concept. Finally, we apply our theory to describe how linear representations of more abstract semantic concepts emerge during training; these can be used to complete analogies via vector addition.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics Explains A Simplicity Bias Across Neural Network ArchitecturesYedi Zhang, Andrew M. Saxe, Peter E. LathamICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Symmetries in language statistics shape the geometry of model representationsDhruva Karkada, Daniel Korchinski, Andres Nava, Matthieu Wyart et al.ICML 2026 · 15 citations
- Alternating Gradient Flows: A Theory of Feature Learning in Two-layer Neural NetworksDaniel Kunin, Giovanni Luca Marchetti, Feng Chen, Dhruva Karkada et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear whyShahriar Noroozizadeh, Vaishnavh Nagarajan, Elan Rosenfeld, Sanjiv KumarICML 2026 · 11 citations
- On the Emergence of Linear Analogies in Word EmbeddingsDaniel J. Korchinski, Dhruva Karkada, Yasaman Bahri, Matthieu WyartNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on25
- A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual RepresentationsTing Chen, Simon Kornblith, Mohammad Norouzi, Geoffrey E. HintonICML 2020 · 24,064 citations
- Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language ModelKenneth Li, Oam Patel, Fernanda B. Viégas, Hanspeter Pfister et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,549 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Provable Guarantees for Self-Supervised Deep Learning with Spectral Contrastive LossJeff Z. HaoChen, Colin Wei, Adrien Gaidon, Tengyu MaNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
Related papers
- Native Hierarchical and Compositional Representations with Subspace EmbeddingsGabriel Moreira, Zita Marinho, Manuel Marques, João Paulo Costeira et al.KDD 2026
- How Do Transformers Learn Topic Structure: Towards a Mechanistic UnderstandingYuchen Li, Yuanzhi Li, Andrej RisteskiICML 2023 · 87 citations
- On the Origins of Linear Representations in Large Language ModelsYibo Jiang, Goutham Rajendran, Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar, Bryon Aragam et al.ICML 2024 · 68 citations
- Embedding Words in Non-Vector Space with Unsupervised Graph LearningMax Ryabinin, Sergei Popov, Liudmila Prokhorenkova, Elena VoitaEMNLP 2020 · 1 citation
- Distilling Semantic Concept Embeddings from Contrastively Fine-Tuned Language ModelsNa Li, Hanane Kteich, Zied Bouraoui, Steven SchockaertSIGIR 2023 · 3 citations
