Incentivizing Consistent, Effective and Scalable Reasoning Capability in Audio LLMs via Reasoning Process Rewards
Jiajun Fan, Roger Ren, Jingyuan Li, Rahul Pandey, Prashanth Gurunath Shivakumar, Ivan Bulyko, Ankur Gandhe, Ge Liu, Yile Gu
Abstract
The role of reasoning in Audio Large Language Models remains widely underexplored, as introducing a reasoning process often degrades rather than improves performance during inference, a phenomenon we term test-time inverse scaling, where longer reasoning chains yield progressively worse results. We demonstrate that this stems not from fundamental limitations of reasoning itself, but from inadequate training: models without proper guidance for the reasoning process produce hallucinatory, inconsistent reasoning that accumulates errors over longer chains. To address these challenges, we introduce CESAR (Consistent, Effective, and Scalable Audio Reasoners), shifting from outcome verification to rewarding the reasoning process. Our online reinforcement learning framework employs Group Relative Policy Optimization with a multi-faceted reward suite that incentivizes not only correctness and format but also consistency, structured analytical patterns, causal reasoning, domain-knowledge integration, and calibrated reasoning depth. CESAR resolves test-time inverse scaling, transforming reasoning from detriments into gains while revealing model-specific "reasoning sweet spots", where performance peaks during test-time scaling. We achieve state-of-the-art results on MMAU Test-mini, substantially outperforming Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-4o Audio, and near-human-level performance on MMSU reasoning tasks. Through AI-as-judge evaluations and qualitative comparisons, we provide both quantitative and qualitative validation of our improved reasoning quality. Importantly, enhanced reasoning creates synergistic effects, simultaneously improving multimodal reasoning and perception capabilities. Overall, CESAR establishes a principled method for developing robust and scalable reasoning in Audio LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1052961b-3d70-4ebd-bbc7-4d50f42c0057Builds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- SALMONN: Towards Generic Hearing Abilities for Large Language ModelsChangli Tang, Wenyi Yu, Guangzhi Sun, Xianzhao Chen et al.ICLR 2024 · 557 citations
- Pengi: An Audio Language Model for Audio TasksSoham Deshmukh, Benjamin Elizalde, Rita Singh, Huaming WangNeurIPS 2023 · 352 citations
- Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language ModelsSreyan Ghosh, Arushi Goel, Jaehyeon Kim, Sonal Kumar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 299 citations
- Listen, Think, and UnderstandYuan Gong, Hongyin Luo, Alexander H. Liu, Leonid Karlinsky et al.ICLR 2024 · 247 citations
Related papers
- Audio-Reasoner: Improving Reasoning Capability in Large Audio Language ModelsZhifei Xie, Mingbao Lin, Zihang Liu, Pengcheng Wu et al.EMNLP 2025 · 5 citations
- Audio-Thinker: Guiding Large Audio Language Model When and How to Think via Reinforcement LearningShu Wu, Chenxing Li, Wenfu Wang, Hao Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Unlocking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Process Reward ModelRuilin Luo, Zhuofan Zheng, Lei Wang, Yifan Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 38 citations
- AuTAgent: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Tool-Augmented Audio ReasoningSiqian Tong, Xuan Li, Yiwei Wang, Baolong Bi et al.ICML 2026 · 3 citations
- When More is Less: Understanding Chain-of-Thought Length in LLMsYuyang Wu, Yifei Wang, Ziyu Ye, Tianqi Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 225 citations
