Knowledge-to-Verification: Exploring RLVR for LLMs in Knowledge-Intensive Domains
Zhonghang Yuan, Zhefan Wang, Fang Hu, Zihong Chen, Jinzhe Li, Gang Li, Jie Ying, Huanjun Kong, Songyang Zhang, Nanqing Dong
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated promising potential to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in domains such as mathematics and coding. However, its applications on knowledge-intensive domains have not been effectively explored due to the scarcity of high-quality verifiable data. Furthermore, current RLVR focuses solely on the correctness of final answers, leading to the limitations of flawed reasoning and sparse reward signals. In this work, we propose Knowledgeto-Verification (K2V), a framework that extends RLVR to knowledge-intensive domains through automated verifiable data synthesis, while enabling verification of the LLM's reasoning process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that K2V enhances the reasoning of LLM in knowledge-intensive domains without significantly compromising the model's general capabilities. This study also suggests that integrating automated data synthesis with reasoning verification is a promising direction to enhance model capabilities in these broader domains. Code is available at https://github. com/SeedScientist/K2V . Recent large language models (LLMs), such as OpenAI-o1 (OpenAI et al., 2024), DeepSeek-R1 (Guo et al., 2025a), and Qwen3 (Yang et al., 2025a), have demonstrated remarkable progress in reasoning. Central to this progress is reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) (Shen et al., 2025; Peng et al., 2025; Stojanovski et al., 2025) , which drives the model to self-explore during training by comparing its outputs against a verifiable ground truth, thereby enhancing its capacity for complex problem-solving.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0ff2aad1-32f1-4fed-a368-2b03f7d7c0c6Builds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
Related papers
- Trust, But Verify: A Self-Verification Approach to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsXiaoyuan Liu, Tian Liang, Zhiwei He, Jiahao Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 46 citations
- Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?Zhiqi Chen, Rui Lu, Andrew Zhao, Zhaokai Wang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1,109 citations
- SynLogic: Synthesizing Verifiable Reasoning Data at Scale for Learning Logical Reasoning and BeyondJunteng Liu, Yuanxiang Fan, Zhuo Jiang, Han Ding et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 49 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMsXumeng Wen, Zihan Liu, Shun Zheng, Shengyu Ye et al.ICLR 2026 · 279 citations
- ReWatch-R1: Boosting Complex Video Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models through Agentic Data SynthesisCongzhi Zhang, Zhibin Wang, Yinchao Ma, Jiawei Peng et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
