Identifiability and Generalizability in Constrained Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam Kamgarpour
Abstract
Two main challenges in Reinforcement Learning (RL) are designing appropriate reward functions and ensuring the safety of the learned policy. To address these challenges, we present a theoretical framework for Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) in constrained Markov decision processes. From a convex-analytic perspective, we extend prior results on reward identifiability and generalizability to both the constrained setting and a more general class of regularizations. In particular, we show that identifiability up to potential shaping (Cao et al., 2021) is a consequence of entropy regularization and may generally no longer hold for other regularizations or in the presence of safety constraints. We also show that to ensure generalizability to new transition laws and constraints, the true reward must be identified up to a constant. Additionally, we derive a finite sample guarantee for the suboptimality of the learned rewards, and validate our results in a gridworld environment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0fee3b13-d9f9-448e-9066-926189e3d653Cited by top-tier papers6
- Towards the Transferability of Rewards Recovered via Regularized Inverse Reinforcement LearningAndreas Schlaginhaufen, Maryam KamgarpourNeurIPS 2024 · 8 citations
- Quantifying the Sensitivity of Inverse Reinforcement Learning to MisspecificationJoar Max Viktor Skalse, Alessandro AbateICLR 2024 · 5 citations
- Robust Optimization for Mitigating Reward Hacking with Correlated ProxiesZixuan Liu, Xiaolin Sun, Zizhan ZhengICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- MisoDICE: Multi-Agent Imitation from Mixed-Quality DemonstrationsThe Viet Bui, Tien Anh Mai, Thanh Hong NguyenNeurIPS 2025
- The Perils of Optimizing Learned Reward Functions: Low Training Error Does Not Guarantee Low RegretLukas Fluri, Leon Lang, Alessandro Abate, Patrick Forré et al.ICML 2025
Builds on12
- On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient MethodsJincheng Mei, Chenjun Xiao, Csaba Szepesvári, Dale SchuurmansICML 2020 · 349 citations
- IQ-Learn: Inverse soft-Q Learning for ImitationDivyansh Garg, Shuvam Chakraborty, Chris Cundy, Jiaming Song et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 271 citations
- Learning to summarize with human feedbackNisan Stiennon, Long Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Daniel M. Ziegler et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 124 citations
- Safe Reinforcement Learning via Curriculum InductionMatteo Turchetta, Andrey Kolobov, Shital Shah, Andreas Krause et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 109 citations
- Of Moments and Matching: A Game-Theoretic Framework for Closing the Imitation GapGokul Swamy, Sanjiban Choudhury, J. Andrew Bagnell, Steven WuICML 2021 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Identifiability in inverse reinforcement learningHaoyang Cao, Samuel N. Cohen, Lukasz SzpruchNeurIPS 2021 · 72 citations
- Identifiability and generalizability from multiple experts in Inverse Reinforcement LearningPaul Rolland, Luca Viano, Norman Schürhoff, Boris Nikolov et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22 citations
- Maximum Likelihood Constraint Inference for Inverse Reinforcement LearningDexter R. R. Scobee, S. Shankar SastryICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Regularized Inverse Reinforcement LearningWonseok Jeon, Chen-Yang Su, Paul Barde, Thang Doan et al.ICLR 2021 · 6 citations
- Reward Identification in Inverse Reinforcement LearningKuno Kim, Shivam Garg, Kirankumar Shiragur, Stefano ErmonICML 2021 · 43 citations
